DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52060] PDF/X-3:2002 should go with PDF Version 1.3

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Glenn Ada

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52060] PDF/X-3:2002 should go with PDF Version 1.3

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 Bug 52060 depends on bug 51385, which changed state. Bug 51385 Summary: [PATCH] Configurable PDF version https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51385 What|Old Value |New Value --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52060] PDF/X-3:2002 should go with PDF Version 1.3

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 --- Comment #4 from Jeremias Maerki 2011-10-21 17:27:51 UTC --- Why so negative? FOP does support PDF/X-3:2003 (based on PDF 1.4) to a certain degree. A successor to the spec you're after. There are lots of others PDF/X specs by now. It ha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52060] PDF/X-3:2002 should go with PDF Version 1.3

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 Willi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52060] PDF/X-3:2002 should go with PDF Version 1.3

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 --- Comment #2 from Mehdi Houshmand 2011-10-20 06:56:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Will Version 1.3 be supported? > > "This allows PDF versions to be specified between 1.4-1.7." > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52060] PDF/X-3:2002 should go with PDF Version 1.3

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 Willi changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||51385 --- Comment #1 from Willi 2011-10-2