It is my sorry, there is no problem with fop-xsl. I will send a new email
to fop-users with related custom xsl.
2015-08-20 19:25 GMT+03:00 Rahman USTA rahman.usta...@gmail.com:
Hi Chris, I'm using default latest docbook fo xsl. I'll use fop-user for
next.
Thanks
2015-08-20 14:17 GMT+03:00
Hi There,
Unfortunately not, that's the XML. We need XSL-FO (which is the input to
FOP) to help you. Also, this is the wrong mailing list for FOP user
questions. You should subscribe to fop-us...@xmlgraphics.apache.org to
ask questions about using FOP.
Thanks,
Chris
On 17/08/2015 18:05,
Hi Chris, I'm using default latest docbook fo xsl. I'll use fop-user for
next.
Thanks
2015-08-20 14:17 GMT+03:00 Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com:
Hi There,
Unfortunately not, that's the XML. We need XSL-FO (which is the input to
FOP) to help you. Also, this is the wrong mailing
Hello;
After investigation, followed docbook content failed;
?xml version=1.0
encoding=UTF-8??asciidoc-toc??asciidoc-numbered?article xmlns=
http://docbook.org/ns/docbook; xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink;
version=5.0 xml:lang=en
info
titleSelam/title
date2015-08-17/date
/info
section
Hi,
please, add further information:
- full error trace,
- attached test case: short XSL-FO (the result of XML+docbook
transformation, not the XML itself) that demonstrates the issue.
2015-08-15 17:40 GMT+02:00 Rahman USTA rahman.usta...@gmail.com:
Hello;
I want to switch 1.1 to 2.0 but
