Simon Pepping a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:02:06PM +0100, Simon Pepping wrote:
>> As discussed recently, I will prepare a release of FOP, to be named
>> 0.93.
>
> I have committed fixes for the reported issues with the dist files. I
> have also fixed a few other issues I discovered. I ha
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:02:06PM +0100, Simon Pepping wrote:
> As discussed recently, I will prepare a release of FOP, to be named
> 0.93.
I have committed fixes for the reported issues with the dist files. I
have also fixed a few other issues I discovered. I have added a few
important changes t
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 10:09:14AM -0600, Jess Holle wrote:
> Is there any sort of time table for a non-alpha/beta 0.9x or 1.0 release?
That is what I am preparing: FOP 0.93 (without beta), to be released
on 2 January 2007.
Regards, Simon
--
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu
Is there any sort of time table for a non-alpha/beta 0.9x or 1.0 release?
--
Jess Holle
I've just updated my view of the status of the subsystems. Some
additional tweaking might be required.
About the graphic: I might design a new one after a xmas break. If
someone beats me to it, all the better.
On 22.12.2006 20:28:21 Simon Pepping wrote:
> I want to do some rewriting of the file s
I want to do some rewriting of the file status.html of the web
site.
Can you give some feedback on the items in the status overview table
at the bottom?
It would be nice to have a few changes to the image as well: display
release 0.93 and the future release 1.0 (without DR1). I cannot do
that.
R
On Dec 22, 2006, at 13:29, Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi Simon,
Uncertain status. The linked bug is resolved, but the description does
not match the description of the bug:
Omitting fo:table-column or having fo:table-column without a
column-width
and attempting to create columns
On 22.12.2006 13:29:19 Simon Pepping wrote:
> I edited the release notes, made some changes to the upgrading and
> changes documents.
>
> I position this new release as the stable release. Version 0.20.5 is
> now advertised the previous release. This is apparent in various
> texts, esp. in the re
I edited the release notes, made some changes to the upgrading and
changes documents.
I position this new release as the stable release. Version 0.20.5 is
now advertised the previous release. This is apparent in various
texts, esp. in the release notes and in 0.93/index.html, and in the
redirects
On 19.12.2006 21:02:06 Simon Pepping wrote:
> As discussed recently, I will prepare a release of FOP, to be named
> 0.93.
>
> Two issues need to be addressed:
>
> 1. I will apply two patches by Richard Wheeldon, to improve memory
>usage:
>
> Bug http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
I created the documentation for version 0.93 (see
src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.93) and edited it for the new
release version. Please, check it. Especial attention is needed for
the new release notes, src/documentation/content/xdocs/relnotes.xml,
most of which still have to be written, the FAQ,
Done, and branch xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-0_93 created.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:02:06PM +0100, Simon Pepping wrote:
> As discussed recently, I will prepare a release of FOP, to be named
> 0.93.
>
> Two issues need to be addressed:
>
> 1. I will apply two patches by Richard Wheeldon, to im
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 05:02, Simon Pepping wrote:
> Manuel, can you hold your changes until the branch has been created?
>
No problems, will wait until the branch is there.
>
> Regards, Simon
Manuel
As discussed recently, I will prepare a release of FOP, to be named
0.93.
Two issues need to be addressed:
1. I will apply two patches by Richard Wheeldon, to improve memory
usage:
Bug http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41009, with
patch http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attach
14 matches
Mail list logo
