On 28.01.2008 20:41:22 Simon Pepping wrote:
> Thanks for your extensive reply.
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:48:52PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > On 25.01.2008 21:57:46 Simon Pepping wrote:
> > > Why does a user need to be able to write his own broadcaster, with his
> > > own event producers
Thanks for your extensive reply.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:48:52PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 25.01.2008 21:57:46 Simon Pepping wrote:
> > Why does a user need to be able to write his own broadcaster, with his
> > own event producers, besides his own listeners? Why is it not enough
> > to
On 28.01.2008 11:52:23 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > On 27.01.2008 16:15:45 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
>
> >>> No, the exception should always contain the cause.
> >> Then I’m missing the point of the new feedback mechanism. Why would you
> >> have to both create an event
Hi Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 27.01.2008 16:15:45 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> But that mentioning of exceptions just makes me wondering of the
>> following: what if an unrecoverable error occurs (say, too many cells on
>> a table row)? I guess I’ll trigger an event of severi
On 27.01.2008 16:15:45 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
> But that mentioning of exceptions just makes me wondering of the
> following: what if an unrecoverable error occurs (say, too many cells on
> a table row)? I guess I’ll trigger an event of severity
> EventSeverity.ERROR and I
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Please see: http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ProcessingFeedback
I still hadn't have time to review this, sorry. Maybe next
Tuesday.
J.Pietschmann
But that mentioning of exceptions just makes me wondering of the
following: what if an unrecoverable error occurs (say, too many cells on
a table row)? I guess I’ll trigger an event of severity
EventSeverity.ERROR and I absolutely expect that /every/ listener will
throw an
On 25.01.2008 21:57:46 Simon Pepping wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not familiar with these technologies, so I have a few questions:
>
> Who creates the broadcaster? The user? In the user agent? Does FOP
> provide the DefaultEventBroadcaster?
The user agent will instantiate and provide the broadcaster (i
Hi,
I am not familiar with these technologies, so I have a few questions:
Who creates the broadcaster? The user? In the user agent? Does FOP
provide the DefaultEventBroadcaster?
Who creates the listener? The user? Registered with his
self-instantiated broadcaster?
The FOP events are created in
On 25.01.2008 17:50:44 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > On 25.01.2008 12:35:50 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> >> Hi Jeremias,
> >>
> >> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >>> That's actually one of the requirements, I just haven't discussed this
> >>> explicitely on the Wiki page. I assumed
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 25.01.2008 12:35:50 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Hi Jeremias,
>>
>> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>> That's actually one of the requirements, I just haven't discussed this
>>> explicitely on the Wiki page. I assumed everyone can throw any unchecked
>>> exception in the listener
On 25.01.2008 12:35:50 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > That's actually one of the requirements, I just haven't discussed this
> > explicitely on the Wiki page. I assumed everyone can throw any unchecked
> > exception in the listener. Introducing a checked exc
Hi Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> That's actually one of the requirements, I just haven't discussed this
> explicitely on the Wiki page. I assumed everyone can throw any unchecked
> exception in the listener. Introducing a checked exception for this
> purpose would be horrible as it would go t
On 24.01.2008 23:15:09 Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> > Of course, we could add these message templates as javadoc tags (like
> > the Blammo proposal, but in all languages) but that puts everything in
> > one file which I'd like to avoid. As long as there are only English
> > it's
> > fine, but if th
On Jan 24, 2008, at 15:45, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Please see: http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ProcessingFeedback
There are now 3 different approaches we could take for an event
mechanism to better inform a user (technical or real-life) of events,
problems and progress inside FOP, per ren
That's actually one of the requirements, I just haven't discussed this
explicitely on the Wiki page. I assumed everyone can throw any unchecked
exception in the listener. Introducing a checked exception for this
purpose would be horrible as it would go through all of FOP which I
don't think would b
Jeremias,
on the message consumer side it would be nice if message handlers could
throw exceptions - this would allow "strict" handlers to immediately
cancel processing of a fo file, a more lenient handlers could just emit
warnings (similar to sax handlers), and a batch system could ignore it.
Ho
Please see: http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ProcessingFeedback
There are now 3 different approaches we could take for an event
mechanism to better inform a user (technical or real-life) of events,
problems and progress inside FOP, per rendering run of course.
I'd be grateful for your thoug
18 matches
Mail list logo
