Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49687] [PATCH] Complex Script Support

2011-06-13 Thread Simon Pepping
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:44:11PM +, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687 > > --- Comment #33 from Glenn Adams 2011-06-10 20:44:11 UTC > --- > I believe this is a side-effect of Simon's incremental merges from trunk into > the Temp_ComplexScr

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49687] [PATCH] Complex Script Support

2010-11-05 Thread Eric Douglas
Are you using embedded code? If it helps, I had issues with the PrintRenderer, so I ended up using the PDFRenderer, getting the output from the transform in a ByteArrayOutputStream, passing that output to pdfbox, and printing with the standard Java print classes. I also found there is a change to

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49687] [PATCH] Complex Script Support

2010-08-19 Thread Glenn Adams
It would be quite helpful if someone could apply and commit this to the Temp_ComplexScripts branch. As usual, let me know if any problems are encountered. Thanks, Glenn On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:14 PM, wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687 > > --- Comment #16 from Gl

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49687] [PATCH] Complex Script Support

2010-08-04 Thread Glenn Adams
Thanks much for testing this patch and confirming its functioning. I will look forward to your future feedback. Note that I have created a page for supported fonts, which I will extend as I test and verify additional fonts with complex scrip

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49687] [PATCH] Complex Script Support

2010-08-04 Thread Pascal Sancho
Glenn, oh, sorry for the mistake, my last PDF was OK. I guess that the cause of my initial trouble was that I patched the branch rather than the trunk. Thank you for your help. I'm happy to see that your patch works fine (with respect or conditions of use ;-) ). I have some Arabic materials to che

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49687] [PATCH] Complex Script Support

2010-08-03 Thread Glenn Adams
OK, I see from your output file that it is indeed working correctly for ArialUni, peforming both bidi and Arabic shaping, i.e., substitution of positional variants and ligatures. Would you agree? Or do you think something is amiss? G. On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Pascal Sancho wrote: > Glen

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49687] [PATCH] Complex Script Support

2010-08-03 Thread Glenn Adams
(1) do you have all of the following fonts on your system? simpo.ttf, simbdo.ttf, arialuni.ttf? (2) if so, are they new versions, e.g., from Win7? (3) if so, then please send me info on the platform you are using and include the output PDF file so I may verify, also send any warnings/errors you rec