Properties - was Sponsorship

Peter B. West wrote: Finn Bock wrote: [Peter B. West] The alt-design property code was, back then, in my eyes, code written by a person who did not intuitively create object oriented design. ... It was, IMO, not a good fundation for further work. Fair enough, apart from the deferred

Properties - was Sponsorship

Peter B. West wrote: Finn Bock wrote: [Peter B. West] The alt-design property code was, back then, in my eyes, code written by a person who did not intuitively create object oriented design. ... It was, IMO, not a good fundation for further work. Fair enough, apart from the deferred

Re: Sponsorship

The Web Maestro wrote: Sorry to hear that you were stewing about this. I suspect it feels better now that it's out in the open (although I'm not convinced this is the best place for it--it might be, I'm just not convinced...). I don't have a lot of emotion about this either way (although I

Re: Sponsorship

On Oct 6, 2005, at 1:30 AM, Peter B. West wrote: I've been stewing on this for quite a while, and as you, at least, seem to have missed the point, I'll vent. Sorry to hear that you were stewing about this. I suspect it feels better now that it's out in the open (although I'm not convinced th

Re: Sponsorship

Finn Bock wrote: [Peter B. West] ... That code was alt-design properties code. It seems to me that many of the ideas and implementation details of alt-design are now sitting in the FOP code base. This is true whether Finn ever looked at the alt-design properties code. It ain't over yet.[1

Re: Sponsorship

[Peter B. West] ... That code was alt-design properties code. It seems to me that many of the ideas and implementation details of alt-design are now sitting in the FOP code base. This is true whether Finn ever looked at the alt-design properties code. It ain't over yet.[1] I did, before

Re: Sponsorship

wo reasons. Firstly, the treat of being > > inundated with begging letters, and secondly, the possibility that they > > might be upsetting their own business partners. > > > > Before you took up the sponsorship offer, you mentioned to me that it > > was on the cards,

Re: Sponsorship

ple > > > to jump in and help again. FOP's gona live! :-) > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > I can understand that some sponsors may be sensitive to divulging > such information, for at least two reasons. Firstly, the treat of > being inundated with begging letters, and second

Re: Sponsorship

of being > inundated with begging letters, and secondly, the possibility that they > might be upsetting their own business partners. > > Before you took up the sponsorship offer, you mentioned to me that it > was on the cards, which I appreciated. I assume you told others as > we

Re: Sponsorship

reasons. Firstly, the treat of being inundated with begging letters, and secondly, the possibility that they might be upsetting their own business partners. Before you took up the sponsorship offer, you mentioned to me that it was on the cards, which I appreciated. I assume you told others as

Re: Sponsorship

(Got my life line back. Phew.) On 29.09.2005 11:58:57 Peter B. West wrote: > Jeremias, > > I meant to ask you when you mentioned your sponsor; who is it? I'm not at liberty to disclose that at this point. > I'm sure they're happy with the work you've put in. Yes, they are. We've already achiev

Sponsorship

Jeremias, I meant to ask you when you mentioned your sponsor; who is it? I'm sure they're happy with the work you've put in. Peter -- Peter B. West Folio smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature