Re: Switching to DocBook [was: svn commit: r960618 [1/3] - in /xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-1_0]

2010-07-08 Thread Simon Pepping
I spent time on the documentation in three ways: 1. Updating the links from 0.95 to 1.0 and from 0.94 to 0.95. This can be avoided if we call the directories 'latest' and 'previous'. 2. Updating the compliance page. I did this with emacs regexes, but they are tricky. I think the setup of the page

Re: Switching to DocBook [was: svn commit: r960618 [1/3] - in /xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-1_0]

2010-07-06 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Vincent, I was actually thinking of converting only the product docs, not the website. For just HTML output, I find Forrest quite nice, but the linking for the various versions creates a lot of overhead for a release. And that's basically what triggered that thought. Basically, I'd suggest to

Re: Switching to DocBook [was: svn commit: r960618 [1/3] - in /xmlgraphics/fop/branches/fop-1_0]

2010-07-06 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 05.07.2010 17:13:32 Simon Pepping wrote: >> In compliance, I kept only 0.95, 1.0 and trunk. This caused extensive >> changes to comments. > > I guess keeping track of various versions on the website is one of the > biggest issues why doing FOP releases is so hard.