Joerg,
I'm glad you volunteer to do any changes. But there's also something
else. We had a vote in March about merging back the API Finalization
branch back into Trunk. You voted +1 back then knowing the the branch
had the word Finalization in it. Furthermore, we've already
communicated with
On Jun 21, 2006, at 08:39, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
snip /
Hi guys,
Sorry for being late. Just been reading this thread, and apart from
the other comments already made, I agree with the plan to release,
and I share most of the other committer's feelings wrt the version
number. Whilst 1.0
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Joerg,
I'm glad you volunteer to do any changes. But there's also something
else. We had a vote in March about merging back the API Finalization
branch back into Trunk. You voted +1 back then knowing the the branch
had the word Finalization in it. Furthermore, we've
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
We had a vote in March about merging back the API Finalization
branch back into Trunk. You voted +1 back then knowing the the branch
had the word Finalization in it.
Some things just need time to sink in.
I don't want style issues block further progress. I brought this
I've updated the ReleasePlanning page. ATM, I've simply changed it to
what I read from this thread. Please, everyone, help sorting out the
details so we can decide where to go.
On 19.06.2006 10:31:15 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
snip/
So maybe we need a feature freeze and bug fixing period?
Not
On 19.06.2006 11:35:18 Chris Bowditch wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 18.06.2006 13:26:00 Manuel Mall wrote:
snip/
Calling a release 1.0 is IMO quite a significant step which shouldn't
been taken lightly. What we are saying in doing so is: Here is
something we believe is ready
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
snip/
Please can you say where you think 0.92beta is behind 0.20.5? The only
issue that I'm aware of is the change of IPD mid-page-sequence.
I've listed them in http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ReleasePlanning
I was a little surprised. It's not just 2 or 3
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Ok, if we want that 1.0 won't be out before September.
Too bad. As already mentioned, changing IPD page masters worked
reasonably well in 0.20.5 and I think people will expect this to
work in a 1.0 release too.
OTOH, if the frequency of questions on the lists are taken
On 18.06.2006 13:26:00 Manuel Mall wrote:
On Sunday 18 June 2006 18:53, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I just realized we should think about the right moment to release
1.0. I guess the number of fixed bugs would suggest a new release
rather sooner than later. I originally thought about going for
On 18.06.2006 22:54:41 J.Pietschmann wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I just realized we should think about the right moment to release 1.0.
I think 1.0 should implement page masters with different
body width in the same page sequence.
Ok, if we want that 1.0 won't be out before September.
On 18.06.2006 20:50:31 Simon Pepping wrote:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:26:00PM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote:
On Sunday 18 June 2006 18:53, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
look a little deeper into the issue. I suspect both items will
require substantial changes in the layout engine which are probably
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 18.06.2006 13:26:00 Manuel Mall wrote:
snip/
Calling a release 1.0 is IMO quite a significant step which shouldn't
been taken lightly. What we are saying in doing so is: Here is
something we believe is ready for production use.
Yes, but neither should we put
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 18.06.2006 20:50:31 Simon Pepping wrote:
snip/
So maybe we need a feature freeze and bug fixing period?
Not only that. We need a Wiki page listing all issues everyone wants to
see fixed/handled before a 1.0 release. We can then decide on which
subset we are
I just realized we should think about the right moment to release 1.0. I
guess the number of fixed bugs would suggest a new release rather sooner
than later. I originally thought about going for an ApacheCon release
but I didn't have enough time. Now, Vincent is working on floats and the
On Sunday 18 June 2006 18:53, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I just realized we should think about the right moment to release
1.0. I guess the number of fixed bugs would suggest a new release
rather sooner than later. I originally thought about going for an
ApacheCon release but I didn't have enough
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:26:00PM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote:
On Sunday 18 June 2006 18:53, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
look a little deeper into the issue. I suspect both items will
require substantial changes in the layout engine which are probably
better done after the next release (or on a
16 matches
Mail list logo
