I was looking at clipping warnings generated by
examples/fo/markers/hide.fo when I noticed that white space around
fo:marker seems significant with respect to the output generated when
the marker is retrieved, e.g.:
some text
when retrieved produces:
some text
while:
some t
Debugging shows:
The FOText instances under fo:marker (just before and after the fo:block)
don't get processed for whitespace treatment. Block.handleWhitespace
isn't accessible to it. That's why the whitespace isn't removed and
causes additional lines. The fix is probably to extract handleWhitespac
On Nov 15, 2005, at 10:03, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The fix is probably to extract handleWhitespace
from Block into a separate class and call it from Block and Marker.
In this respect: I still wonder whether it wouldn't be more
convenient to split up the whitespace handling, and deal with the
Sounds like a good plan to me. Would you go after that?
On 15.11.2005 18:06:13 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2005, at 10:03, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
>
> > The fix is probably to extract handleWhitespace
> > from Block into a separate class and call it from Block and Marker.
>
> In thi
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 03:45 am, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Sounds like a good plan to me. Would you go after that?
>
I have no problems with the suggestion to move the white space handling
from Block into its own class so other fo's that need it can make use
of it.
However, I still need to be convin
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Sounds like a good plan to me. Would you go after that?
Jeremias: I have similar concerns to Manuel about this. Moving the
handleWhitespace method to a different class is probably okay, but I
don't think we should start making any major changes to Whitespace
handling
Well, my fault. I didn't so much follow the whole whitespace discussion
to know every detail. I assumed there was some kind of consensus by now.
On 16.11.2005 11:15:48 Chris Bowditch wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> > Sounds like a good plan to me. Would you go after that?
>
> Jeremias: I hav
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:15:47AM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote:
> I have no problems with the suggestion to move the white space handling
> from Block into its own class so other fo's that need it can make use
> of it.
>
> However, I still need to be convinced that pushing it down to inline
> leve
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 03:40 am, Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:15:47AM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote:
> linefeed-treatment is a local operation on a single character.
>
Yes
> white-space-collapse does not cross FO boundaries because the spec
> limits this to sibling character FOs.
>
Y
(Sorry for the delayed reply...)
On Nov 16, 2005, at 01:15, Manuel Mall wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 03:45 am, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Sounds like a good plan to me. Would you go after that?
Sure thing. For now, I'll restrict it to moving handleWhitespace()
into a separate class, maybe one i
10 matches
Mail list logo
