Re: svn commit: r521640 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/table/ColumnSetup.java test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/table-column_missing.xml

2007-03-24 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Mar 23, 2007, at 13:49, Vincent Hennebert wrote: We would then have two methods of iterating over tables: one fast, memory-efficient relying on columns specifications, Slight addition: "... relying on column specifications or, if those are absent, on cells in the first row." This is en

Re: svn commit: r521640 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/table/ColumnSetup.java test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/table-column_missing.xml

2007-03-23 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Jeremias Maerki a écrit : > Sorry, I wasn't aware of that. I have trouble keeping up lately. That's ok, just wanted to be sure we were on the same track. > I guess you're welcome to throw a ValidationException when strict > validation is on and fixed table layout is in use. Something like that,

Re: svn commit: r521640 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/table/ColumnSetup.java test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/table-column_missing.xml

2007-03-23 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Sorry, I wasn't aware of that. I have trouble keeping up lately. I guess you're welcome to throw a ValidationException when strict validation is on and fixed table layout is in use. On 23.03.2007 12:30:02 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Jeremias, > > > Author: jeremias > > Date: Fri Mar 23 02:19:04 2

Re: svn commit: r521640 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/table/ColumnSetup.java test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/table-column_missing.xml

2007-03-23 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Jeremias, > Author: jeremias > Date: Fri Mar 23 02:19:04 2007 > New Revision: 521640 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=521640 > Log: > Avoid an IndexOutOfBoundsException when more columns are used than are > specified even though this is illegal with fixed table layout. What ab