Hi Jeremias,
Modified:
xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/Typeface.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/Typeface.java?rev=591583r1=591582r2=591583view=diff
Statistical interest. Increasing a long shouldn't use many more CPU
cycles than setting a boolean to true, right?
Jeremias Maerki
On 05.11.2007 11:32:09 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Jeremias,
Modified:
xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/Typeface.java
URL:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Statistical interest. Increasing a long shouldn't use many more CPU
cycles than setting a boolean to true, right?
That’s not a problem of performance. When I see this I simply wonder why
a long is used while a boolean would be sufficient. Statistical
interest, why not,
On Nov 5, 2007, at 12:42, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Statistical interest. Increasing a long shouldn't use many more CPU
cycles than setting a boolean to true, right?
That’s not a problem of performance. When I see this I simply
wonder why
a long is used while a