On 20.08.2008 15:40:08 Max Berger wrote:
> Dear Fop-Devs,
>
> I hope this commit does not break gump - if so I'll revert it.
No, we'll try to fix the Gump run first! This is useful after all. I'll
look into the Gump descriptor right away to avoid any problems I can fix
before the next run.
> Wha
Dear Fop-Devs,
I hope this commit does not break gump - if so I'll revert it.
What this does: If you set properties to point to a java 1.4
installation, it will try to verify if fop uses only the classes
available there and output a warning.
The retroweaving process is currently done but unsused