On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:50:51AM +, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pascal Sancho wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I partially agree, but...:
> > - both releases (0.94: 2007, 0.95: 2008) are posterior to REC 1.1 (2006);
> > - both releases implement some REC 1.1 new features (Cf. bookmarks).
> >
Hi,
Pascal Sancho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I partially agree, but...:
> - both releases (0.94: 2007, 0.95: 2008) are posterior to REC 1.1 (2006);
> - both releases implement some REC 1.1 new features (Cf. bookmarks).
>
> I can revert the change, but that will not reflect the above things, IMHO.
> WDYT
Hi,
I partially agree, but...:
- both releases (0.94: 2007, 0.95: 2008) are posterior to REC 1.1 (2006);
- both releases implement some REC 1.1 new features (Cf. bookmarks).
I can revert the change, but that will not reflect the above things, IMHO.
WDYT?
--
Pascal
Simon Pepping a écrit :
> Not
Note that pages 0.94/upgrading.xml and 0.95/upgrading.xml talk about
versions 0.94 and 0.95, even though the page calls it the latest
version. I think it is not correct to talk about FO 1.1 here, because
at the time of the releases FO 1.1 was not really considered. These
pages are as they were incl
