Folks,
I'd like to mention a change I will implement on IFPainter#drawText method
in order to accommodate complex scripts (as well as non-complex script usage
in a variety of written languages). I'm bringing this up now so there can be
discussion ahead of time if needed.
Basically, the change is
Perhaps it is useful to indicate how the existing dx[] adjustments map into
the more generalized gpos[][] adjustments. Given a dx[] array or a gpos[][]
array or neither, they are reconciled as follows:
int[][] reconcileAdjustments(int[] dx, int[][] gpos) {
if ( dx == null ) {
return gpos;
Oops, that code snippet should read:
int[][] reconcileAdjustments(int[] dx, int[][] gpos) {
if ( dx == null ) {
return gpos;
} else {
if ( gpos == null ) {
gpos = new int[dx.length][4];
}
for ( int i = 0; i < dx.length; i++ ) {
int d = dx[i];
if ( *d* != 0 ) {
Hi Glenn,
A dedicated class with meaningful fields (e.g., xPlacement, xAdvance)
would probably be preferable to an array of 4 int. This would be safer
and easier to understand and use.
For the rest, that sounds good.
Vincent
Glenn Adams wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to mention a change I will
Thanks, that's a good suggestion. I've been contemplating that for a while
now.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi Glenn,
>
> A dedicated class with meaningful fields (e.g., xPlacement, xAdvance)
> would probably be preferable to an array of 4 int. This would be safer
