RE: Omitting content length

2002-04-16 Thread Arved Sandstrom
essage- > From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: April 16, 2002 3:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Omitting content length > > > There was a recent post on chunked transfer. I haven't checked it out, > but it might help you. >

Re: Omitting content length

2002-04-16 Thread Jeremias Maerki
There was a recent post on chunked transfer. I haven't checked it out, but it might help you. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=101791907122593&w=2 Cheers, Jeremias Märki mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OUTLINE AG Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern Tel. +41 41 317 2020 - Fax +41

RE: Omitting content length

2002-04-15 Thread Arved Sandstrom
ng it itself - it'll probably close the connection on you anyway after committing the first buffer. Hope that helps. Regards, AHS > -Original Message- > From: Brian O'Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: April 15, 2002 7:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

Omitting content length

2002-04-15 Thread Brian O'Kelley
Ignore the question below - it works (if anyone needs SAX example, this is decent). It looks like what is happening is that I was writing this directly to a servlet's outputstream, so I never set the content length header. This made IE puke, although Lynx caught it ok. I've read through the thread