Re: IPD error although width="100%"

2004-05-26 Thread Chris Bowditch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... hi.. i got this error message everytime i run my fop : [WARNING] Sum of fixed column widths 793693 greater than maximum specified IPD 0 This error is simply saying that youve declared columns whose total width is greater than the width of the page. Column widths need

Re: IPD

2003-09-05 Thread jaccoud
TED]Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] m> cc: (cco: Marcelo Jaccoud Amaral/RJ/Petrobras) Assunto: Re: IPD

Re: IPD

2003-09-04 Thread Glen Mazza
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > One has to partially forgive our American friends > for such offenses -- > after a century, they still don't use the metric > system, you cannot ask > them to respect the prefixes. > Ich bin mit Ihnen gar nicht einverstanden! The prefixes milli, centi, kilo, etc

RE: IPD

2003-09-04 Thread Victor Mote
Marcelo Jaccoud Amaral wrote: > By the way, "point" is a terrible measurement unit, because in typography > there are three kinds of points: > - the Anglo-Saxon point = 1/12 pica = 0,013835 in = 0,3514 mm (no, > it's not exactly 1/72 in !!) > - the Didot point = 0,3759 mm > - the

Re: IPD

2003-09-04 Thread jaccoud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: (cco: Marcelo Jaccoud Amaral/RJ/Petrobras) e> Assunto: Re: IPD

Re: IPD

2003-09-04 Thread J.Pietschmann
Bernd Brandstetter wrote: What's the problem? I doubt that ISO owns a patent on those prefixes :-) It depends. ISO declared it illegal. In many countries this is backed by law, in the sense if you use an inappropriate combination and someone takes damage or even only feels confused because of this,

Re: IPD

2003-09-04 Thread Bernd Brandstetter
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 21:48, J.Pietschmann wrote: > Should be "1/1000 pt", not millipoint, unless you want to attract > the wrath of the ISO community for using ISO prefixes with non-ISO > measurement units... What's the problem? I doubt that ISO owns a patent on those prefixes :-) Bye,

Re: IPD

2003-09-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Chris Bowditch wrote: I think the unit of IPD is millipoints, but I am not 100% certain, Should be "1/1000 pt", not millipoint, unless you want to attract the wrath of the ISO community for using ISO prefixes with non-ISO measurement units... J.Pietschmann

RE: IPD

2003-09-03 Thread Victor Mote
Chris Bowditch wrote: > >Now my question: > >What is the exact conversion between IPD and pt or px and so on? > >The value ipd says nothing for me. > > IPD stands for Inline Progression Dimension. In some cases this > equates to > width, but this is not true in general, if reference-orientation

Re: IPD

2003-09-03 Thread Chris Bowditch
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now my question: What is the exact conversion between IPD and pt or px and so on? The value ipd says nothing for me. IPD stands for Inline Progression Dimension. In some cases this equates to width, but this is not true in general, if reference-orientation is non-zero (no

Re: IPD error

2003-07-02 Thread J.Pietschmann
Todtenhaupt, Susann wrote: While transforming with fop I always get the error-message: At least one of minimum, optimum, or maximum IPD must be specified on table. The table width is usually calculated as the sum of the column widths. If you missed supplying a width for some columns, o

RE: IPD error

2003-07-02 Thread Jamie Stillman
For the first problem, you must specify a column-width attribute for your table-column. There's no automatic sizing of table columns. Example Leaving out the column-width will generate a message from FOP that no column width information has been supplie