Re: FOP - -noannotations

2005-04-18 Thread Mike Trotman
Thanks Andreas. Yes - I am opening these in Acrobat Reader 7.0. I know previous versions of Reader didn't allow adding comments. but I know version 7.0 allows adding comments. I had imagined this could be controlled by normal PDF encryption / permissions but maybe you need Adobe LiveCycle to

Re: FOP - -noannotations

2005-04-18 Thread Mike Trotman
Thanks Patrick - this is invaluable advice! I have MANY bookmarks in all my documents - so I will put the encryption investigation on a lower priority (as I have lived without it for 4 years so far). Mike Talken, Patrick (AGRE) wrote: Hi Mike, I went through the same ordeal, and when I finally

Encryption and bookmarks (was RE: FOP - -noannotations)

2005-04-18 Thread JBryant
I went through the same ordeal, and when I finally got the encryption to work I discovered that my pdf bookmarks became unreadable. So, if you have bookmarks in your pdf that you want to keep, you may want to skip trying to get the encryption installed. Me, too. It'd be very nice if

embed existing in PDF

2005-04-18 Thread Rob Gordon
Hi-- Is there a way to 'include' an existing PDF the output stream of a FO transformation, something akin to fo:instream-foreign-object or fo:external-graphic? Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Generating table of contents using FO and FOP?

2005-04-18 Thread JBryant
The only trouble is that tables of contents aren't generally rendered as tables. Each is generally rendered as a series of paragraphs. Jay Bryant Bryant Communication Services (presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies) Luke Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/18/2005 01:27 PM

Re: FOP - -noannotations

2005-04-18 Thread Mike Trotman
Thanks for looking at this Andreas Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: -Original Message- From: Mike Trotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes - I am opening these in Acrobat Reader 7.0. I know previous versions of Reader didn't allow adding comments. but I know version 7.0 allows adding comments.

How to help producing version 1.0 (was: Re: FOP - -noannotations)

2005-04-18 Thread Jeremias Maerki
There are many ways you can help without the need for Java knowledge: - Helping other people on fop-users - Writing test cases - Writing documentation (Wiki or Forrest sources) - Updating the compliance page with additional columns for the new code (thus showing the progress in relation to FOP

FOP - external-graphic in absolutely positioned block container.

2005-04-18 Thread Mike Trotman
I have what seems like some weird inconsistent when trying to use block-container to absolutely position a graphic. (This is often a sign that one is doing something stupid - and a fresh pair of eyes can help.) The code below works OK (at least it shows the graphic - I still have to adjust the

RE: FOP - -noannotations

2005-04-18 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] snip / I'm also thinking... Currently FOP 0.20.5 produces PDF conforming to the 1.3 Specification (Acrobat 4.0) --maybe that version still lacks the necessary commands to make it 'commentable' by Reader 7.0 (=

RE: FOP - external-graphic in absolutely positioned block container - increase the width and the image vanishes!

2005-04-18 Thread Roland Neilands
Mike, However - my main question still remains: Why - when an image is displayed 'correctly' - does making the block-container BIGGER make the image vanish? Does anyone else have any experience of this? Yes, if the block-container no longer fits wholly within static-content for example, it