AW: Re: FOP and acroform

2005-09-13 Thread Sascha Schmidt
Hi, Florian Hecht has written in seminar paper about such an extension, but it's in German: http://www.ipd.uni-karlsruhe.de/~gelhausen/sud/Eine%20Formularerweiterung%20f%FCr%20XSL-FO.pdf I'm using this extension experimentally to transform RTF forms into PDF forms. ;-) Cheers, Sascha > >No,

Re: upgrading from 20.0.5 to the trunk

2005-09-13 Thread Sonja Löhr
That positioning was totally arbitrary, so I moved generate-id onto the cell and everything is fine! Thank you once more :-) sonja Am Dienstag, den 13.09.2005, 18:53 +0200 schrieb Jeremias Maerki: > I should have realized from your snippets what was wrong. D'oh! The > problem is that on certa

Re: FOP and acroform

2005-09-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
No, because something like that is not implemented. If it were it would be documented on the website. It has been mentioned that at some point someone wrote an extension element that allowed injecting raw PDF code into the output file which allowed the creation of PDF forms if someone had a lot of

FOP and acroform

2005-09-13 Thread zhlu
Can some one show me how to use FOP with fox tag to generate an AcroForm pdf file? -Henry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: upgrading from 20.0.5 to the trunk

2005-09-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I should have realized from your snippets what was wrong. D'oh! The problem is that on certain FOs the "id" property is not properly processed, yet, and therefore not available to page-number-citation. This was properly shown in our test cases but not on our compliance page and I didn't remember, s

Re: upgrading from 20.0.5 to the trunk

2005-09-13 Thread Sonja Löhr
Am Dienstag, den 13.09.2005, 17:41 +0200 schrieb Jeremias Maerki: > You can send the FO file to me directly, and I'll try to isolate the > problem so I can create a simple, automatable test case for our > collection. case it is not my fault!! The file is on its way ... > > On 13.09.2005 17

Re: upgrading from 20.0.5 to the trunk

2005-09-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
You can send the FO file to me directly, and I'll try to isolate the problem so I can create a simple, automatable test case for our collection. On 13.09.2005 17:22:33 Sonja Löhr wrote: > > > > > Can you provide an example? I can't reproduce the problem. Thanks. > > Of course. > Shall/May I a

Re: upgrading from 20.0.5 to the trunk

2005-09-13 Thread Sonja Löhr
> Can you provide an example? I can't reproduce the problem. Thanks. Of course. Shall/May I attach the whole big fo file here so you could just plug it in? Here are some snippets. The index table of contents has its own page-sequence-master as it is in two columns. In the pdf output, there i

Re: upgrading from 20.0.5 to the trunk

2005-09-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 13.09.2005 16:42:41 Sonja Löhr wrote: > > > Many, many thanks for the great help, Jeremias! You're welcome. :-) > I finally got something out !! > Font configuration worked well thanks to your example. I had to fight > down some new exceptions because of overflows that didn't occur before.

Re: upgrading from 20.0.5 to the trunk

2005-09-13 Thread Sonja Löhr
Many, many thanks for the great help, Jeremias! I finally got something out !! Font configuration worked well thanks to your example. I had to fight down some new exceptions because of overflows that didn't occur before. Just one "trunk-only" problem remains: The page-number-citations now show