Hi,
there is no best method to insert line breaks; this depends on context.
If you have a text containing LF that must be preserved, it should be
nested in a single fo:block.
As a good practice, a fo:block with LF-treatment=preserve should not
contain extra fo:blocks.
Le 22/02/2012 06:29, Lal
Hello!
We have to create a pdf document and each page will have a different layout
as follows:
* The first page has its own layout.
* The second page has its own layout and this is where a big table starts.
* Every 7th sheet (page num 13, 25, 37, 49, 61, etc.), the page has its own
layout.
Will you be addressing the static regions of the seventh pages
differently from one another. In other words does e.g. region-before or
page 13 get the same content as region-before on page 25?
On 02/22/2012 08:20 AM, Maria Manta wrote:
Hello!
We have to create a pdf document and each page
OK, I understand what you mean now. Your editor/authoring tool adds
those ?Pub Caret? and you don't want that to break your PDF generation.
I don't know what the expected behavior should be. I will have to
investigate.
On 2/22/12 1:04 AM, Craig Christophersen wrote:
From xml and xsl.
Exactly. Except I have no control over the editing/authoring tool used or
its configuration. My process must handle it if it meets xml specs.
From: Luis Bernardo [mailto:lmpmberna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 4:41 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: xml
Sorry, meant to add. I think the expected behavior in textual content would
be to be able to ignore the processing instruction. It seems to be ignored
if it occurs in places other than textual content..
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
example
para text con?Pub Caret?tent here /para?Pub
As far as an XML parser is concerned you have 3 nodes within the “para”
element; two separate text nodes with the PI in between them.
Your XSL would need to string both text nodes together instead of just showing
the first one.
I’m a bit rusty on this sorry, but there should be a couple of ways
