Hi Michael, what do you mean with "cleaning it"? How did you made it to work with FOP 0.94 or 0.93 without jimi?
Thanks, kaspersky Michael Wechner wrote: > > Chris Bowditch wrote: > >> Jeremias Maerki wrote: >> >> <snip/> >> >>> >>> So if FOP does want Jimi, putting it in the classpath hopefully fixes >>> the problem. But still, I'm at a loss to explain why the JimiImage class >>> is triggered in the first place. >> >> >> The Original Post said FOP had been built via Maven. So could it be >> that the FOP Maven POM has an incorrect dependency on Jimi? > > > I didn't see any for FOP-0.93 > > The code of FOP-0.93 itself is calling Jimi during runtime via dynamic > class loading, and hence one will not notice the missing Jimi lib until > actually running it. > > But as said, after cleaning it's working now fine (which is strange > though ;-) > > Cheers > > Michael > >> >> <snip/> >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > -- > Michael Wechner > Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Yanel, Yulup > http://www.wyona.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +41 44 272 91 61 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError%3A-com-sun-jimi-core-Jimi-tp17645069p17688561.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
