Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 17.12.2005 13:40:47 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
With FOP 0.90, it shouldn't pose a problem AFAICT, to instantiate
multiple FOUserAgents each linked to a different configuration. When
constructing Fop instances, you can rather easily decide which
FOUserAgent to use.
On 17.12.2005 13:40:47 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2005, at 22:17, David P. Nesbitt wrote:
>
> > It is possible to have separate configurations of FOP
> > running within the same JVM?
> >
> > I am using the following to configure FOP:
> >
> > new org.apache.fop.apps.Options(userCo
On Dec 16, 2005, at 22:17, David P. Nesbitt wrote:
It is possible to have separate configurations of FOP
running within the same JVM?
I am using the following to configure FOP:
new org.apache.fop.apps.Options(userConfigFile);
Not sure if this is possible with FOP 0.20.5... will have to
It is possible to have separate configurations of FOP
running within the same JVM?
I am using the following to configure FOP:
new org.apache.fop.apps.Options(userConfigFile);
But I would like to have more than one configuration
used within the same application server.
Regards,
Dave
__
