Hi,
please consider this issue solved. Other PDF viewers don't show the issue,
so apparently the flag is not that important.
- Lauri
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional command
Philipp Wagner philipp-wagner.com> writes:
>
> It does look fine here in Acroread as well as in Okular; I would not
> expect FOP to actually do the scaling but the PDF viewer, but maybe the
> devs can answer that better than I do.
Further googling lead me to see that there's a flag embedded in
Am 02.07.2013 17:54, schrieb Philipp Wagner:
Am 02.07.2013 16:15, schrieb Lauri Kasanen:
Luis Bernardo gmail.com> writes:
Your screen capture is not half an inch, so we don't know where the
scaling comes from. Have you tried to zoom in with your PDF viewer?
If you still have questions pleas
Am 02.07.2013 16:15, schrieb Lauri Kasanen:
Luis Bernardo gmail.com> writes:
Your screen capture is not half an inch, so we don't know where the
scaling comes from. Have you tried to zoom in with your PDF viewer?
If you still have questions please provide original image, your fo file,
any f
Luis Bernardo gmail.com> writes:
> Can you attach the file? I am unable to download it.
Gmane does not let me do that. Trying another hoster:
https://anonfiles.com/file/ba2371af6890b4f038dbfe0665d49c96
http://stashbox.org/v/1170761/fopzip.zip
- Lauri
-
Can you attach the file? I am unable to download it.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
> Luis Bernardo gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Your screen capture is not half an inch, so we don't know where the
> scaling comes from. Have you tried to zoom in with your PDF viewer?
> > If yo
Luis Bernardo gmail.com> writes:
> Your screen capture is not half an inch, so we don't know where the
scaling comes from. Have you tried to zoom in with your PDF viewer?
> If you still have questions please provide original image, your fo file,
any fop.xconf if using it, and the generated pdf.
36 pt, which is half an inch I understand.
> At a target DPI of 300, this would be 150x150.
>
> As you can see in the pic, it's obvious FOP uses a poor quality image
> scaling algorithm, nearest-neighbor, or point sampling in GL terms.
>
> How can I tell FOP to use a better qual
x27;s obvious FOP uses a poor quality image
scaling algorithm, nearest-neighbor, or point sampling in GL terms.
How can I tell FOP to use a better quality algorithm? Ideally at least
bicubic, but bilinear would be a great improvement too.
Thanks,
- Lauri
PS: Please CC me, not subsc
