Pascal Sancho wrote:
Hi
> Tested on both FOP 0.92 (works badly) and FOP_TRUNK (works
> fine), this has been corrected in latest code
Ok, thanks for the info. I'll wait for 0.93 to add this
functionality. And thanks to Stefan and Manuel: you're right, my
samples were not well-formed (my fau
> -Original Message-
> From: Florent Georges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:05 PM
>
> Hi
>
> I discovered the following issue with FOP 0.92beta (but I'm
> not sure it is an issue). With the following two blocks, I
> get two different results:
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
In both blocks one closing is missing.
How you generate the FO file?
Stefan
Florent Georges schrieb:
> Hi
>
> I discovered the following issue with FOP 0.92beta (but
> I'm not sure it is an issue). With the following two
> blocks, I get
On Thursday 14 September 2006 21:05, Florent Georges wrote:
> Hi
>
> I discovered the following issue with FOP 0.92beta (but
> I'm not sure it is an issue). With the following two
> blocks, I get two different results:
>
>padding-bottom="0pt"
> padding-top="0p
