The XSL-FO style approach would be not to use "always" for the keep
property but an integer number. But this hasn't been implemented, yet.
On 13.09.2006 21:15:13 cknell wrote:
> I' recently back to working with FOP. I have a document that consists of
> a number of tables with widely-varying number
I know that if a table has 20 or more rows, it won't fit on a single page. I
deal with such large tables in my XSLT like this:
page
auto
...
...
Here I am dealing with a situation where the number of rows on a particular
table may not be very large, but
"Pascal Sancho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 09/14/2006 07:47:09 AM:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 9:15 PM
> >
> > I' recently back to working with FOP. I have a document that
> > consists of a numbe
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 9:15 PM
>
> I' recently back to working with FOP. I have a document that
> consists of a number of tables with widely-varying numbers of
> rows. Sometimes several tables will f
Hi
I'm not an experienced user, but have you tried "keep-with-next"? It did work
for me, although with other undesired side-effects (see my post with the
superlong title "keep-with-next causes last row of previous table to come
along".
regards
---