kaspersky wrote:
Hi Michael,
what do you mean with "cleaning it"?
rm -r ~/.m2
and then rebuild the project we are using (whereas all libs and poms
were downloaded again via ant+maven)
How did you made it to work with FOP
0.94 or 0.93 without jimi?
as said it was kind of strange, be
Hi Michael,
what do you mean with "cleaning it"? How did you made it to work with FOP
0.94 or 0.93 without jimi?
Thanks,
kaspersky
Michael Wechner wrote:
>
> Chris Bowditch wrote:
>
>> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> So if FOP does want Jimi, putting it in the classpath hopefully fi
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
So if FOP does want Jimi, putting it in the classpath hopefully fixes
the problem. But still, I'm at a loss to explain why the JimiImage class
is triggered in the first place.
The Original Post said FOP had been built via Maven. So could it be
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
So if FOP does want Jimi, putting it in the classpath hopefully fixes
the problem. But still, I'm at a loss to explain why the JimiImage class
is triggered in the first place.
The Original Post said FOP had been built via Maven. So could it be that
the FOP Maven POM
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
ok, I just wanted to upgrade to 0.94 to see if there is any difference,
whereas for example ibiblio doesn't seem to contain 0.94
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/fop/fop/
See here:
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/xmlg
On 05.06.2008 10:25:29 Michael Wechner wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> >Hey Michi
> >
> >In theory, FOP 0.93 should run without Jimi. Why it doesn't work for you
> >is a little unclear to me. Since you use Java 1.5, the image should have
> >been loaded over ImageIO or one of the bundled image
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hey Michi
In theory, FOP 0.93 should run without Jimi. Why it doesn't work for you
is a little unclear to me. Since you use Java 1.5, the image should have
been loaded over ImageIO or one of the bundled image codecs (depending
on what image format you tried to load).
Hey Michi
In theory, FOP 0.93 should run without Jimi. Why it doesn't work for you
is a little unclear to me. Since you use Java 1.5, the image should have
been loaded over ImageIO or one of the bundled image codecs (depending
on what image format you tried to load).
Anyway, Jimi is old and was m
Michael Wechner wrote:
Hi
I am using FOP for JDK1.5 via Maven
.m2/repository/fop/fop/0.93/
fop-0.93-jdk15.jar fop-0.93.pom fop-0.93.pom.md5
and everything compiles fine, but when executing then I receive the
following error
ERROR org.apache.fop.image.AbstractFopImage.loadImage():157 - E
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/graphics.html#jimi
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wechner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 June 2008 13:03
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sun/jimi/core/Jimi
Hi
I am using FOP for JDK1.5 via Mav
10 matches
Mail list logo
