Re: reference-orientation inside table-cell

2019-06-03 Thread Chris
Hi, A fo:block-container is an out of flow object, meaning that it can appear anywhere on the page esp when you specify absolute-position="position" I realize you didn't do that, but wouldn't it make more sense to apply reference-orientation to table-cell instead? Thanks, Chris On 22/05/2019

Re: reference-orientation in inline:container

2017-10-23 Thread Marc
Thank you very much for the answer about the cell and block-container I didn't think about that. I will try because I know the sizes. Marc Le 23/10/2017 à 19:03, Bob Stayton a écrit : Indeed, reference-orientation is not supported yet in inline-container in FOP, according to the Compliance docu

Re: reference-orientation in inline:container

2017-10-23 Thread Bob Stayton
Indeed, reference-orientation is not supported yet in inline-container in FOP, according to the Compliance document (and the link from there): https://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html Regarding the block-container behavior, when you do 90 degree rotation, you may have to adjust the s

Re: reference-orientation and tables (FOP 0.95)

2009-09-04 Thread bonekrusher
Pascal et al, Thanks... this was actually causing another problem on a nested table also. Thanks a bunch Phil -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/reference-orientation-and-tables-%28FOP-0.95%29-tp25294461p25294844.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at N

RE: reference-orientation and tables (FOP 0.95)

2009-09-04 Thread Amick, Eric
All of the table-cells have display-align="center", so I'm not surprised it's coming out that way. Am I missing something? Eric Amick LCS Office of the Clerk -Original Message- From: bonekrusher [mailto:djs...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 9:33 To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apa

Re: reference-orientation and tables (FOP 0.95)

2009-09-04 Thread Pascal SANCHO
Hi, bonekrusher a écrit : Hi, please see attached example. I have a table with in a block container that is rotated 90 degrees. I am having a problem with the cell alignment. If you look at the pdf output, my cells are centered. I need them to be aligned bottom (the word "test" should start at t

RE: reference-orientation on fo:table-cell or fo:table

2006-05-10 Thread Pascal Sancho
Regarding properties appliance, the new 1.1 WD REC seems more precise. (there is no equivalent to Appendix B4 in 1.0 REC) I have to read it before my next question... Sorry. Pascal > -Original Message- > From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I think the spec test in 7.20.

Re: reference-orientation on fo:table-cell or fo:table

2006-05-10 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I think the spec test in 7.20.3 is misleading if not wrong. As far as I understand reference-orientation, it applies only to formatting objects which generate viewport/reference pairs, not to those which only generate a reference area, even if the text says something else. Only viewports have the a

Re: reference-orientation

2006-02-28 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 28.02.2006 13:10:07 Andre Groeneveld wrote: > Thanks, that works perfectly, is there a way though that I can pass the > page-number through to the barcode generator? With the Xalan or Saxon extension this is impossible because the barcode is generated before FOP's layout engine kicks in. You'l

RE: reference-orientation

2006-02-28 Thread Andre Groeneveld
Sent: 28 February 2006 11:30 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: reference-orientation No, that doesn't work. There's no extension that would make Apache Batik understand what to do with the http://barcode4j.krysalis.org/ns namespace in the embedded SVG document. This nam

Re: reference-orientation

2006-02-28 Thread Jeremias Maerki
> > > > > > But I doesn't print a barcode at all. > > Can you please tell me whether it is possible of rotating the barcode, > and if yes, will instream-foreign-object work in this case? >

RE: reference-orientation

2006-02-28 Thread Andre Groeneveld
is possible of rotating the barcode, and if yes, will instream-foreign-object work in this case? -Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 February 2006 09:45 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: reference-orientation Sure, you can

Re: reference-orientation

2006-02-27 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Tel: (011) 489 - 4117 > Fax: (011) 489 - 4128 > > -Original Message- > From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 February 2006 06:01 PM > To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org > Subject: Re: reference-orientation > > Ask yourself what

RE: reference-orientation

2006-02-27 Thread Andre Groeneveld
@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: reference-orientation Ask yourself what "not implemented" means. FOP does not support it, obviously. The good thing about your second question today is that I know now which version of FOP you're using: 0.20.5. If you upgrade to the latest release 0.91b

Re: reference-orientation

2006-02-27 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Ask yourself what "not implemented" means. FOP does not support it, obviously. The good thing about your second question today is that I know now which version of FOP you're using: 0.20.5. If you upgrade to the latest release 0.91beta you can use reference-orientation because it's implemented, ther