So, result is as expected.
You should fix it in one of the following ways:
- fix the image resolution (44417 is not a useful value);
- or remove content-height property,
- or specify an absolute value for the height.
THANKS for the advice. I was unaware of the
strange size numbers
Before I post anything else, I want to give a million thanks to the
developers of FOP. I have been using it since its infancy, and I can't
believe how far it has come, and how excellent the output is. It must
have taken an incredible amount of work to write something so complicated.
Good job
DaFENG
Coder
Telecommunication Network Industry
Pudong
Shanghai
China
I was going 'round and 'round on getting fonts to register when calling FOP
from Ant, and then I found Jeremias's mention that he'd fixed the Ant task
and his link to the relevant file in SVN. So I rebuilt FOP (0.92beta) and
got my fonts. Yay!
Thanks, Jeremias!
Thanks to that change (which
released the product this week - see press release below or click
on the following if you're interested in learning more:
http://www.cambridgedocs.com/products/downloads/WordFODesigner.htm
Thanks again,
Riz
Rizwan Virk
CTO
CambridgeDocs
[EMAIL
Hi Andreas,
I tested belows what you wrote.
.TEST CASE1:usage of (x)path
.TEST CASE2:position of region-body
.TEST CASE3:position of fo:block-container
.TEST CASE4:limitation of fo:block-container
TEST CASE1,2 will be good part of my own xsl foramt.
TEST CASE3,4 helped me to decide direction
