On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:37 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 14.02.2006 04:38:18 Paul Tremblay wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:08:16AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
From: Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:08:16 +0100
Subject: Re: dif
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 14.02.2006 04:38:18 Paul Tremblay wrote:
Thanks. This is good to know. FOP is more compliant in one area than
the closed-source XEP.
Hehe, I could give a nice list of things FOP does in a more compliant
fashion than XEP.
Yes I know, but not all of them enable great
On 14.02.2006 04:38:18 Paul Tremblay wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:08:16AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > From: Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:08:16 +0100
> > Subject: Re: differnece between fop and xep: which is