you guys are getting rather off topic here; i'd suggest you start a new
thread if you wish to continue
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 12:03 PM, Samuel Penn wrote:
>
> The general layout of the documents themselves isn't particulary exciting.
> There's a lot I
On Thursday 06 September 2012 19:57:03 Rob Sargent wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 12:03 PM, Samuel Penn wrote:
> > The general layout of the documents themselves isn't particulary
> > exciting. There's a lot I'd like to be able to do, especially around
> > image and table layout (auto-placement of images,
On 09/06/2012 12:03 PM, Samuel Penn wrote:
The general layout of the documents themselves isn't particulary
exciting. There's a lot I'd like to be able to do, especially around
image and table layout (auto-placement of images, and stretching them
across two text columns etc), which doesn't yet
On Thursday 06 September 2012 17:07:37 Rob Sargent wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 06:04 AM, Samuel Penn wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:46:23 -0600, Rob Sargent
> >
> > wrote:
> >> I have long suspected that what we're asking FOP to do is somewhat
> >>
> >> "out there". Man would I love a review of
On 09/06/2012 06:04 AM, Samuel Penn wrote:
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:46:23 -0600, Rob Sargent
wrote:
I have long suspected that what we're asking FOP to do is somewhat
"out there". Man would I love a review of my xsl/fo
transformation. 2700+ lines of xsl can't be a good thing!
That doesn't se
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:46:23 -0600, Rob Sargent
wrote:
I have long suspected that what we're asking FOP to do is somewhat
"out there". Man would I love a review of my xsl/fo
transformation. 2700+ lines of xsl can't be a good thing!
That doesn't seem that bad. My own XSLT for FOP is pushing
I hate to wimp-out on you good sir, but I'm /really/ under the gun right
now. It will be at least a week before I can (attempt to) put together
an example fo.
I have long suspected that what we're asking FOP to do is somewhat "out
there". Man would I love a review of my xsl/fo transformation
On 04/09/12 16:04, Rob Sargent wrote:
> Wonderful. Thank you very much. It's working great here.
>
> An interesting twist on the other side of this thread (re:
> MAX_RECOVERY_ATTEMPTS). We find that if the last image-bearing page of a
> chapter is a text-less gallery page the page immediately fo
Wonderful. Thank you very much. It's working great here.
An interesting twist on the other side of this thread (re:
MAX_RECOVERY_ATTEMPTS). We find that if the last image-bearing page of
a chapter is a text-less gallery page the page immediately following
page is confused about it's column-c
I’ve just submitted a fix to trunk:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1380667&view=rev
Vincent
On 30/08/12 20:54, rsargent wrote:
> Ok if Vincent agrees this is a bug I can make the issue and supply the test
> fo. The patch is his and I don't think I should claim it.
>
>
> Glenn Adams-2 wrote
Ok if Vincent agrees this is a bug I can make the issue and supply the test
fo. The patch is his and I don't think I should claim it.
Glenn Adams-2 wrote
>
> First, someone needs to open a bug and submit a patch against the bug.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-fop.1065347
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:40 AM, rsargent wrote:
> I am happy to report (rather belatedly I'm afraid) that the patch has done
> the trick.
>
> The test fo supplied no longer presents the problem and we see none in our
> book. It's hard to know from the book itself whether the lack of problems
> i
I am happy to report (rather belatedly I'm afraid) that the patch has done
the trick.
The test fo supplied no longer presents the problem and we see none in our
book. It's hard to know from the book itself whether the lack of problems is
happy coincidence or not, but the test is quite clear.
Is t
13 matches
Mail list logo
