That positioning was totally arbitrary, so I moved generate-id onto the
cell and everything is fine!
Thank you once more :-)
sonja
Am Dienstag, den 13.09.2005, 18:53 +0200 schrieb Jeremias Maerki:
> I should have realized from your snippets what was wrong. D'oh! The
> problem is that on certa
I should have realized from your snippets what was wrong. D'oh! The
problem is that on certain FOs the "id" property is not properly
processed, yet, and therefore not available to page-number-citation.
This was properly shown in our test cases but not on our compliance page
and I didn't remember, s
Am Dienstag, den 13.09.2005, 17:41 +0200 schrieb Jeremias Maerki:
> You can send the FO file to me directly, and I'll try to isolate the
> problem so I can create a simple, automatable test case for our
> collection.
case it is not my fault!!
The file is on its way ...
>
> On 13.09.2005 17
You can send the FO file to me directly, and I'll try to isolate the
problem so I can create a simple, automatable test case for our
collection.
On 13.09.2005 17:22:33 Sonja Löhr wrote:
>
>
>
> > Can you provide an example? I can't reproduce the problem. Thanks.
>
> Of course.
> Shall/May I a
> Can you provide an example? I can't reproduce the problem. Thanks.
Of course.
Shall/May I attach the whole big fo file here so you could just plug it
in? Here are some snippets.
The index table of contents has its own page-sequence-master as it is in
two columns.
In the pdf output, there i
On 13.09.2005 16:42:41 Sonja Löhr wrote:
>
>
> Many, many thanks for the great help, Jeremias!
You're welcome. :-)
> I finally got something out !!
> Font configuration worked well thanks to your example. I had to fight
> down some new exceptions because of overflows that didn't occur before.
Many, many thanks for the great help, Jeremias!
I finally got something out !!
Font configuration worked well thanks to your example. I had to fight
down some new exceptions because of overflows that didn't occur before.
Just one "trunk-only" problem remains:
The page-number-citations now show
On 12.09.2005 13:31:14 Sonja Löhr wrote:
>
> I try learning ...
>
> Could you please just tell me whether I am on the right track for
> configuration with the fop-trunk?
>
>
> DefaultConfigurationBuilder confbuilder = new
> DefaultConfigurationBuilder();
> Configuration fileconf =
> confbuild
I try learning ...
Could you please just tell me whether I am on the right track for
configuration with the fop-trunk?
DefaultConfigurationBuilder confbuilder = new
DefaultConfigurationBuilder();
Configuration fileconf =
confbuilder.buildFromFile(ctx.getRealPath(CONFIG_FILE));
DefaultConfigura
Thank you for the turbo-answer, Jeremias!
We wrote at the same time ...
I would be brave ;-) and change the code since it is really small and
differs not much from what happens in FopServlet, I just have some In-
and OutputStreams between but should come along with the javadoc for
that.
The on
Ok, I can now answer some of my questions myself ;-)
I use the Fop class instead of the Driver class, right?
I'll try to change the code according to the source of FopServlet,
putting the extra steps somwhere between.
But some questions remain:
a) What about the configuration? I have had the fol
Sorry, Sonja, but a lot of changes have happened during the redesign
which break API compatibility. The packages and classes you listed don't
exist anymore. And the new API has not been documented, yet. This will
be done in the next two weeks and before the first preview release. In
the meantime, y
Hi!
After inspecting the new compliance page (:-)) great improvements!!), I
finally downloaded the trunk and built it.
Now my servlet code is missing several packages/classes :
org.apache.fop.messaging
org.apache.fop.configuration
and classes in org.apache.fop.apps (Driver and Options)
Did I miss
13 matches
Mail list logo
