Re: [foreman-dev] Merge permissions for Katello/katello

2017-10-31 Thread Justin Sherrill
Given its been a number of days with no -1's, I've now granted you access! Congrats! Justin On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Eric D Helms wrote: > +1 > > On Oct 31, 2017 9:10 AM, "Andrew Kofink" wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Brad Buckingham >> wrote: >> >>> +1 from me

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge Permissions for Katello/katello

2017-10-31 Thread Justin Sherrill
Given its been a number of days with no -1's, I've now granted you access! Congrats! Justin On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Eric D Helms wrote: > +1 > > On Oct 31, 2017 10:17 AM, "Walden Raines" wrote: > >> +1, figured you already had merge permissions. >> >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:16 AM,

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge Permissions for Katello/katello

2017-10-31 Thread Eric D Helms
+1 On Oct 31, 2017 10:17 AM, "Walden Raines" wrote: > +1, figured you already had merge permissions. > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Brad Buckingham > wrote: > >> +1 to providing Andrew with merge permissions!! >> >> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Andrew Kofink >> wrote: >> >>> Hello,

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge permissions for Katello/katello

2017-10-31 Thread Eric D Helms
+1 On Oct 31, 2017 9:10 AM, "Andrew Kofink" wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Brad Buckingham > wrote: > >> +1 from me as well! >> >> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:19 AM, John Mitsch wrote: >> >>> +1 from me! >>> >>> John Mitsch >>> Red Hat Engineering >>> (860)-967-7285 <(860)%2096

Re: [foreman-dev] Foreman instrumenting analysis

2017-10-31 Thread Eric D Helms
Before I give a full reply, can you comment, for each given library below, which are able to run without requiring a separate process? For context, I am thinking of the container scenario where I am running Foreman as a single process in a container and want it to be serving up metrics for collecti

[foreman-dev] Foreman instrumenting analysis

2017-10-31 Thread Lukas Zapletal
Hello, I am seeking for app instrumenting protocol for Foreman Rails application that will fulfill the following requirements: The protocol must work with multi-process server like Passneger. The protocol can be easily integrated into Foreman Tasks and Smart Proxy. The protocol or agent must supp

Re: [foreman-dev] I am happy to write the headline release notes

2017-10-31 Thread Tomer Brisker
Hi Bryan, The list of issues can be found here: http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/foreman/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f%5B%5D=release_id&op%5Brelease_id%5D=%3D&v%5Brelease_id%5D%5B%5D=240 On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Bryan Kearney wrote: > I would like to know the details of the

Re: [foreman-dev] 1.17 schedule

2017-10-31 Thread Greg Sutcliffe
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 13:11 +0100, Marek Hulán wrote: > I think the date is reasonable. Given we have 2-3 RCs per 2 weeks, we > could expect 1.17 release early next year right? Which I think is > good since we'll have time to fix potential blockers after we're back > from Christmas time off. 1.16

[foreman-dev] I am happy to write the headline release notes

2017-10-31 Thread Bryan Kearney
I would like to know the details of the headline features in 1.16 [1]. I would be happy to write the text and put int he PR if the authors can point me at the issues. I can then run it bye you guys for edits. -- bk [1] https://theforeman.org/manuals/1.16/index.html#Headlinefeatures -- You rece

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge Permissions for Katello/katello

2017-10-31 Thread Walden Raines
+1, figured you already had merge permissions. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Brad Buckingham wrote: > +1 to providing Andrew with merge permissions!! > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Andrew Kofink > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm not sure why I waited so long to ask, but in light of other

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge permissions for Katello/katello

2017-10-31 Thread Andrew Kofink
+1 On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Brad Buckingham wrote: > +1 from me as well! > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:19 AM, John Mitsch wrote: > >> +1 from me! >> >> John Mitsch >> Red Hat Engineering >> (860)-967-7285 <(860)%20967-7285> >> irc: jomitsch >> >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Jonatho

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge permissions for Katello/katello

2017-10-31 Thread Brad Buckingham
+1 from me as well! On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:19 AM, John Mitsch wrote: > +1 from me! > > John Mitsch > Red Hat Engineering > (860)-967-7285 <(860)%20967-7285> > irc: jomitsch > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Jonathon Turel wrote: > >> Hey folks, >> >> The time has come (through some helpfu

Re: [foreman-dev] Merge Permissions for Katello/katello

2017-10-31 Thread Brad Buckingham
+1 to providing Andrew with merge permissions!! On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Andrew Kofink wrote: > Hello, > > I'm not sure why I waited so long to ask, but in light of other requests, > I submit my own. Here are my merged PRs >

Re: [foreman-dev] 1.17 schedule

2017-10-31 Thread Marek Hulán
I think the date is reasonable. Given we have 2-3 RCs per 2 weeks, we could expect 1.17 release early next year right? Which I think is good since we'll have time to fix potential blockers after we're back from Christmas time off. -- Marek On úterý 31. října 2017 12:59:12 CET Ohad Levy wrote: >

Re: [foreman-dev] 1.17 schedule

2017-10-31 Thread Ohad Levy
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Ondrej Prazak wrote: > Hi, > based on the Redmine release dates [1], 1.17 is supposed to be branched on > December 1st. Do we want to stick to this plan or do we want to take into > account that 1.16 was delayed? > > Let me know what you think, > Given the fact t

[foreman-dev] 1.17 schedule

2017-10-31 Thread Ondrej Prazak
Hi, based on the Redmine release dates [1], 1.17 is supposed to be branched on December 1st. Do we want to stick to this plan or do we want to take into account that 1.16 was delayed? Let me know what you think, Ondra [1] http://projects.theforeman.org/rb/releases/foreman -- You received this m

Re: [foreman-dev] Koji builder crash - days after

2017-10-31 Thread Lukas Zapletal
Guys, I configured logwatch on Koji as well, cron output and logwatch is currently being delivered to my Red Hat address. It looks like Postfix is able to deliver to redhat.com emails just fine, but when I tested this with gmail.com it did not work out. Do we have some infra mailing list for this