Hi Konstantin,
Would it be possible to enable debug logging when running the slow search
and posting the logs with the detailed information in the issue?
That will display exactly which queries were the slow ones so that we can
locate the bottle neck and fix the issue.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 7:1
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Tomer Brisker wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> Would it be possible to enable debug logging when running the slow search
> and posting the logs with the detailed information in the issue?
> That will display exactly which queries were the slow ones so that we can
> loc
Ok, patch applied, works :)
Thank you very much!
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 12:48:59 PM UTC+2, Erez Zarum wrote:
>
> Hey Tomer,
> I was under the impression i am the only one having it (haven't tested on
> a fresh install), will track it.
>
> Thanks,
> Erez
>
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2016
No problem, for how long you think i should have it running to give
valuable data to work with?
I am running only on objects-total and objects (as you mentioned)
On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 7:05:28 PM UTC+2, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>
> Can you guys try foreman-tracer utility (SystemTap based, wi
Could you please comment on the pull request as well (
https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/3980)? That way reviewers will
know that it has already been tested and fixes the issue.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Erez Zarum wrote:
> Ok, patch applied, works :)
>
> Thank you very much!
>
>
No problem.
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 1:03:17 PM UTC+2, Tomer Brisker wrote:
>
> Could you please comment on the pull request as well (
> https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/3980)? That way reviewers will
> know that it has already been tested and fixes the issue.
>
> On Tue, Nov 1,
I wasn't sure how long to run them, so I ran each for 60 seconds.
foreman-tracer rails objects-total
http://pastebin.com/QdZePcWQ
foreman-tracer rails objects
http://pastebin.com/jVbDRm3c
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 2:58:48 AM UTC-4, ohad wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Justin
I wasn't sure how long to run them, so I ran each for 60 seconds.
foreman-tracer rails objects-total
http://pastebin.com/QdZePcWQ
foreman-tracer rails objects
http://pastebin.com/jVbDRm3c
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Foreman users" group.
To uns
Ok one minute is fine, the counters will reset in 5 minutes anyway.
Ok, the problem is in setup_clone / setup_object_clone method which
creates a deep copy of each record for comparison. But I wonder how is
possible you have 20k calls of this clone after just 1 minute.
Tell me more about your inf
Thank you very much for the help Greg.
On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 2:58:30 PM UTC-5, Greg Sutcliffe wrote:
>
> The default templates that come with Foreman install Puppet by default,
> assuming the host has a Puppetmaster set in the UI. If you're not using the
> defaults, you can look at [1]
Hi Mr. McMahan,
thank you for the answer. I'll try it out.
I have tried the interactive version
foreman-installier -i
Is there somewhere a mapping of the command line options with the interactive
options or where do I have to check it in the scripts?
Greetings and thanks,
Tobias
Von: Jason M
Two or three minutes is just fine, counters do reset after 5 minutes
so not longer.
You can also add "rails calls" output as well, that might be interesting too.
LZ
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Erez Zarum wrote:
> No problem, for how long you think i should have it running to give valuable
On 01/11/16 14:23, Tobias Köck wrote:
> Hi Mr. McMahan,
>
>
>
> thank you for the answer. I'll try it out.
>
>
>
> I have tried the interactive version
>
>
>
> foreman-installier -i
>
>
>
> Is there somewhere a mapping of the command line options with the
> interactive options or wh
Hello,
what you describe sounds as UI issue, the JS should redraw the form so one
could specify attached devices etc. It seems easily reproducible and is
probably caused by strong params change. Please send the issue number here. A
workaround might be to use API for now.
--
Marek
On pondělí 3
I can confirm the behavior, NIC page does not reload in 1.13 and develop,
reported here:
http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/17170
LZ
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Jorick Astrego wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Further with testing I discover that the "Add interface" dialog on "New
> host" or pro
*rails objects-total*
*OBJECT COUNTERB 826Nic::Managed
104Foreman::Parameters::Caster 38IPAddr
24ConfigReportStatusCalculator
24ActiveSupport::HashWithIndifferentAccess 18SafeRender
10Range 9ActionView::OutputBuf
Okay, now we're getting somewhere. This is an environment with five oVirt
nodes in two clusters.
Cluster1: 2 nodes
Cluster2: 3 nodes
Each have a handful of VMs, some manually installed, and some provisioned
by Foreman spanning both clusters.
The oVirt nodes each appear to have maybe 10-50 nics
foreman-tracer rails calls:
http://pastebin.com/80ziGqXr
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 12:06:45 PM UTC-4, Justin Foreman wrote:
>
> Okay, now we're getting somewhere. This is an environment with five oVirt
> nodes in two clusters.
> Cluster1: 2 nodes
> Cluster2: 3 nodes
>
> Each have a handful
See the 'ignore interfaces with matching identifier' option under Settings
-> Provisioning.
I had the same problem with Docker network interfaces.
Josh
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Justin Foreman wrote:
> Okay, now we're getting somewhere. This is an environment with five oVirt
> nodes in
I have the "theforeman/puppet" module, when i search under the "Classes"
dashboard the word "puppet" it's seems to cause a very high CPU and memory
starts to increase up to 6GB from almost 1GB.
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 5:19:36 PM UTC+2, Erez Zarum wrote:
>
> *rails objects-total*
>
> *OBJ
Good day,
We have foreman 1.13 installed, we are attempting to provision a new
windows image based vm guest.
After looking around i found the following articles.
https://www.inovex.de/blog/deploying-windows-server-with-foreman-in-vsphere/
http://www.herbert.org.nz/?p=245
After reading through th
I set it to ignore the offending interface names, but the issue of
increasing Nic::Managed count was still happening. I found that the
offending hosts had hundreds of duplicate interfaces. I wrote a little
hammer script to delete all interfaces from the hosts. Now, all appears to
be well.
Than
Here you go
- https://gist.github.com/korekhov/7ad0fddae6e330f1655305c626bb4808
Please let me know if that's not enough and you need something else.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop re
>
>
>> or, even better if you are willing to share your database dump :)
>
>
Sorry, I can't do that :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Foreman users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to foreman
Hi All,
I'd like to use host collection as an attribute in a smart matcher that's
applied to a specific smart class parameter override in puppet.
Looking in a hosts YAML file i don't see host collection listed as one of
the parameters so I'm not sure if this is possible at the moment?
Thanks
G
25 matches
Mail list logo
