On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:54:48PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:36:38PM +0200, Martin Baehr wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:31:27PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> > > $ conary rq --components --all-troves --trove-flags
> > > uvcvideo-kernel=/foresight.rpa
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:23:27AM +0200, Martin Bähr wrote:
> conary-2.2 is not released yet, so there is still time to change how
> conary update works.
And, on those lines, I wanted to say that this whole conversation
has been very helpful, and we're looking at changing semantics
as a result of
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:36:38PM +0200, Martin Baehr wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:31:27PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> > $ conary rq --components --all-troves --trove-flags
> > uvcvideo-kernel=/foresight.rpath@fl:devel//2-qa-kernel/0-0.2-1
> > uvcvideo-kernel=0-0.2-1 [Redirect -
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:31:27PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> $ conary rq --components --all-troves --trove-flags
> uvcvideo-kernel=/foresight.rpath@fl:devel//2-qa-kernel/0-0.2-1
> uvcvideo-kernel=0-0.2-1 [Redirect -> Nothing]
> uvcvideo-kernel:debuginfo=0-0.2-1 [Redirect -> Nothing]
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:08:59PM +0200, Martin Baehr wrote:
> ok, so how do i install it?
> even the most explicit:
> # conary update
> uvcvideo-kernel=/foresight.rpath@fl:devel//2-qa-kernel/0-0.2-1
> or
> # conary install
> uvcvideo-kernel=/foresight.rpath@fl:devel//2-qa-kernel/0-0.2-
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:24:32AM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> > # conary rq uvcvideo-kernel
> > uvcvideo-kernel=0-0.2-1
> > # conary update uvcvideo-kernel
> > No troves found matching: uvcvideo-kernel
> > # conary update uvcvideo-kernel=0-0.2-1
> > No troves found matching: uvcvideo-kernel
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:51:57PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> "conary install --info foo" in the system model is really effectively
> "search for foo in all available packages in my system model". The
> question is whether we need some different behavior that warrants a
> different verb at
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 05:44:45PM +0200, Martin Baehr wrote:
> the question is, which behaviour do we want for foresight?
> do we want to add the installLabelPath to a default foresight install?
For normal users, I feel fairly strongly that sticking to the
groups will give them a better experienc
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:24:32AM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> I expect because uvcvideo-kernel is not in the groups in your
> search path.
i suspected something like that.
> "conary rq" searches the repository, not the current search path in
> your model. The model does not fall back to
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:20:59AM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> > conary update does nothing useful at all.
> No, conary does nothing useful *in this scenario*.
sorry, that is exactly what i meant. i did not mean to imply a
generalization, obviously i have not seen other scenarios, so i can
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 05:02:12PM +0200, Martin Baehr wrote:
> here is another puzzling behaviour:
>
> # conary rq uvcvideo-kernel
> uvcvideo-kernel=0-0.2-1
> # conary update uvcvideo-kernel
> No troves found matching: uvcvideo-kernel
> # conary update uvcvideo-kernel=0-0.2-1
> No troves found ma
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 04:42:28PM +0200, Martin Baehr wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:02:05AM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> > I don't follow this. You said, "it doesn't work" and then, as
> > far as I can tell, demonstrated that "conary install skype" does
> > exactly what you want. Can
here is another puzzling behaviour:
# conary rq uvcvideo-kernel
uvcvideo-kernel=0-0.2-1
# conary update uvcvideo-kernel
No troves found matching: uvcvideo-kernel
# conary update uvcvideo-kernel=0-0.2-1
No troves found matching: uvcvideo-kernel=0-0.2-1
# conary install uvcvideo-kernel
No troves fou
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:02:05AM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> I don't follow this. You said, "it doesn't work" and then, as
> far as I can tell, demonstrated that "conary install skype" does
> exactly what you want. Can you explain what it was that conary did
> after you ran "conary insta
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:09:47AM +0200, Martin Baehr wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:18:05AM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> > > one point i hope to find is that conary gives feedback explaining why
> > > there is nothing to update.
> > That's a flaw, I think. We haven't wired things up e
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:18:05AM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> > one point i hope to find is that conary gives feedback explaining why
> > there is nothing to update.
> That's a flaw, I think. We haven't wired things up enough to recognize
> lines which are no-ops. I could see something li
16 matches
Mail list logo
