[Foresight-devel] Re: system-model users: important change!

2010-10-20 Thread Martin Baehr
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 05:39:02PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote: > For this reason, you should consider running genmodel again, > even on a system on which you already have an /etc/conary/system-model > file, in order to generate a better, more useful model. is it helpful (for genmodel testing)

[Foresight-devel] Re: system-model users: important change!

2010-10-20 Thread Michael K. Johnson
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:25:53PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote: > I have successfully built conary 2.2.alpha_7e40b066b71c and after > new groups finish building, your updates will include conary > 2.2.alpha_7e40b066b71c. It looks like António and I both built groups at the same time, and they

[Foresight-devel] Re: system-model users: important change!

2010-10-20 Thread Michael K. Johnson
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 05:39:02PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 03:10:21PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote: > > I am currently building a new snapshot: conary=2.2.alpha_caf708cb7e9e > > > > IMMEDIATELY AFTER you update to this shapshot (or later, if I update > > furth

[Foresight-devel] Re: system-model users: important change!

2010-10-20 Thread Michael K. Johnson
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 03:10:21PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote: > I am currently building a new snapshot: conary=2.2.alpha_caf708cb7e9e > > IMMEDIATELY AFTER you update to this shapshot (or later, if I update > further) There was a bug in caf708cb7e9e and I updated further, to 522ceb8766a5.

[Foresight-devel] system-model users: important change!

2010-10-20 Thread Michael K. Johnson
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 05:18:01PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:23:27AM +0200, Martin Bähr wrote: > > conary-2.2 is not released yet, so there is still time to change how > > conary update works. > > And, on those lines, I wanted to say that this whole conversation

[Foresight-devel] Re: conary 2.2 snapshot on fl:2-devel

2010-10-20 Thread Michael K. Johnson
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 05:00:27PM +0800, Jesse Zhang wrote: > Hi, > On 10/15/2010 12:31 AM, Michael K. Johnson wrote: > > When you run conary install/update/erase commands, they modify that > > file, and then apply it to the system. > > It seems 'erase -i' is broken? Indeed. In general, I think

[Foresight-devel] Re: conary 2.2 snapshot on fl:2-devel

2010-10-20 Thread Michael K. Johnson
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:41:21AM +0200, Martin Baehr wrote: > is there a way to watch what conary sends over the wire? Yes! The CONARY_CLIENT_LOG environment variable specifies a file to which to write a binary log of XML-RPC traffic, and it works with both conary and cvc. CONARY_CLIENT_LOG=/t

[Foresight-devel] Re: conary 2.2 snapshot on fl:2-devel

2010-10-20 Thread Jesse Zhang
Hi, On 10/15/2010 12:31 AM, Michael K. Johnson wrote: > When you run conary install/update/erase commands, they modify that > file, and then apply it to the system. It seems 'erase -i' is broken? [je...@localhost ~]$ conary erase -i quilt ERROR: An unexpected condition has occurred in Conary. T