On 01/26/2011 11:38 PM, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> So to get the real size of the installed packages on a particular
> filesystem, you need to get the troves, with files (but without
> file contents), only single-count hardlink groups, and then use
> an algorithm that takes into account particular
On 01/26/2011 11:38 PM, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> So to get the real size of the installed packages on a particular
> filesystem, you need to get the troves, with files (but without
> file contents), only single-count hardlink groups, and then use
> an algorithm that takes into account particular
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 05:26:32PM +0100, Martin Bähr wrote:
> i think the current info is already sufficient to help find the low
> hanging fruits which will help bring down the size of the install.
I'm saying that the ordering could be substantially different
when you calculate sizes differently
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:38:01AM -0500, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> So to get the real size of the installed packages on a particular
> filesystem, you need to get the troves, with files (but without
> file contents), only single-count hardlink groups, and then use
> an algorithm that takes into
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:58:24PM +0800, Jesse Zhang wrote:
> For example on the x86_64 system, glibc accounts for 12% of the whole
> system. And from big to small, mono>faenza-icon-theme>sun-jdk>kernel.
...
> See it for yourself. On the second sheet, the size of :locale troves are
> shown.
Comp
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:57:59AM -0500, Og Maciel wrote:
> mkj is currently working on that and it may even be done already
> (there was an issue around)...
According to my testing, it's all done, so let me know whether
anything fails to work.
What I tested was that both http://foresightlinux.o
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Mark Trompell wrote:
> On http://www.foresightlinux.org/download/ there is a link to
> http://www.foresightlinux.org/hg/ which explains how to use our hg
> server. But hg.foresightlinux.org is down since a while now, and it
> might take some time (if ever) to get i
Heya Devnet,
mkj is currently working on that and it may even be done already
(there was an issue around)...
Thanks,
--
Og B. Maciel
GNOME Foundation Board of Directors
omac...@foresightlinux.org
ogmac...@gnome.org
GPG Keys: D5CFC202
http://www.ogmaciel.com (en_US)
http://blog.ogmaciel.com (p
Done! I have created a new "alumni" section and would like help to
back fill it. Also, can developers volunteer to send in their info?
Does anyone feel like providing a better description for my entry too?
Cheers,
--
Og B. Maciel
GNOME Foundation Board of Directors
omac...@foresightlinux.org
ogm
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Og Maciel wrote:
> However, I'd like to make this a post-2.5 release topic to be
> discussed perhaps by a newer Council?
Sure, that's fine to me! :)
> I'd like to also discuss about
> our default applications and see if we can make the end user
> experience somet
Hi Jesse,
First off, thank you so much for doing this! I have dreamed of the day
we can shrink the size of our ISO for quite some time, and even though
progress has been made on this front, I still find it pretty hefty.
However, I'd like to make this a post-2.5 release topic to be
discussed perhap
Hi,
Maybe you have been annoyed by the huge size of the foresight iso
images. So do I. So here [0] is some audit data about the default
packages in a foresight install.
You will be able to see the total number of packages, their total
size, and the percentage of each package in the total size.
F
12 matches
Mail list logo
