> if you don't want to replace everyone at each turn then the term should
> be at least twice as long as an election turn.
That's why I 'offered my seat' halfway through the new council members term.
> however i think there should be an option to reelect someone who has
> been a council member be
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:48:56AM +0200, Mark Trompell wrote:
> I would propose to replace Ken and Paul for now only, so that we don't
> have to replace the whole council at once *every* turn. This will
> provide some stability in our direction.
> I think a term should be a year at least (debatabl
So here it goes,
how might our council look like?
Currently we have 5 council members, which is good as it's an odd
number so we get always a decision (if no one abstains).
at the moment we only have 3 active members (even not too bad since
it's still odd).
So I think we should keep the 5, making d
