2011-10-24 08:14, Tomas Forsman skrev:
> 2011-10-24 08:06, Mark Trompell skrev:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Tomas Forsman
>>wrote:
>>> Some changes was done in conary, so it ignores the context that's
>>> specified in folders.
>>> And yes, that change might be a bad idea.
>>>
>>> Fayek
2011-10-24 08:06, Mark Trompell skrev:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Tomas Forsman
> wrote:
>> Some changes was done in conary, so it ignores the context that's
>> specified in folders.
>> And yes, that change might be a bad idea.
>>
>> Fayek and I had to add that line to be able to install
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Tomas Forsman
wrote:
>
> Some changes was done in conary, so it ignores the context that's
> specified in folders.
> And yes, that change might be a bad idea.
>
> Fayek and I had to add that line to be able to install .ccs files, or it
> was impossible.
No not imp
2011-10-24 01:23, Michael K. Johnson skrev:
> http://lists.rpath.org/pipermail/foresight-commits/2011-October/050767.html
> is a bad idea. Part of the point of *having* developer contexts is
> specifically not to use them as root. Perhaps instead, we could have
> a blank developer context in the
http://lists.rpath.org/pipermail/foresight-commits/2011-October/050767.html
is a bad idea. Part of the point of *having* developer contexts is
specifically not to use them as root. Perhaps instead, we could have
a blank developer context in the default config that is overridden
in the developer c
