On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 09:36:17PM +0200, Martin Bähr wrote:
> unless someone beats be to it i'll try to make a new group tomorrow
> night. i'll probably start with group-gnome-dist-devel and remove all
> the :devel and :devellib troves, trying to create a group that only
> contains applications ne
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 04:37:11PM -0400, Eric Lake wrote:
> I think that the group-gnome-devel-tools is pretty good. But could it
> be more generic. Maybe group-devel-tools. Seeing as how this could be
> use by more than just Gnome users.
yes, it is probably the set of packages shared between
gro
I think this has been needed for a while. I always installed
group-devel (and now g-g-d-d in FL 2) as one of the first updates
after a fresh FL install, and, although now that I do packaging I need
all of it, it was really annoying to have to download all of that
stuff when all I needed was gcc/mak
I think that the group-gnome-devel-tools is pretty good. But could it
be more generic. Maybe group-devel-tools. Seeing as how this could be
use by more than just Gnome users.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Ken VanDine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think what we need there is something like a gr
I think what we need there is something like a group-gnome-devel-tools
or something like that, focused on the toolset not the headers, etc...
The point of group-gnome-dist-devel was to ease getting all the headers.
--Ken
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 21:36 +0200, Martin Bähr wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:04:42AM -0400, Eric Lake wrote:
> I guess the real question that has to be answered if we were to do
> something like this is "What would go in the group?". I think that the
> build-essential package that ubuntu uses would be a good place to
> start.
i just tried to inst
I guess the real question that has to be answered if we were to do
something like this is "What would go in the group?". I think that the
build-essential package that ubuntu uses would be a good place to
start.
--
Thanks,
Eric Lake
___
Foresight-devel
On 18/8/08 15:15, "Martin Bähr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 09:48:52AM -0400, Eric Lake wrote:
>> We have all seen people come into the #foresight channel and ask what
>> they need to run to get the tools needed to compile apps from source.
>> Sure we would rather then jus
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 09:48:52AM -0400, Eric Lake wrote:
> We have all seen people come into the #foresight channel and ask what
> they need to run to get the tools needed to compile apps from source.
> Sure we would rather then just install whatever app it is from the
> repo but they really want
just having installed [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2-devel _may_ do. The problem with
pointing people just to it, is that it is too thin, lacking too much
desktop (and thorefore FL) specific stuff.
(although group-{xfce,gnome,kde}-devel are fat enough fact is people
still complain too that stuff is missing i
10 matches
Mail list logo
