hi,
i just came across this article about google code-in
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2011/03/parrot-foundation-reflects-on-google.html
maybe also something worth trying...
greetings, martin.
--
cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix
services: d
There is already in python 3 a converter program that manages
automatically some syntax changes like strings and octal formats.
But before fully dropping in python 3, python 2.7 understands both the
new and old syntax to let time to convert.
Maybe i should look in a ruby based package manager like
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:40:30PM -0400, Mihai Ibanescu wrote:
> Even if Fedora moves to python 3, conary will probably stay on python
> 2 for the foreseeable future, by shipping with its own version of
> python.
i do not think that even fedora can afford to drop python 2 for the
forseeable futu
ot; , "Mark Trompell"
, "Og Maciel"
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 12:27:08 PM
Subject: [Foresight-devel] Re: Google Summer of Code
Hello,
2011/3/12 Martin Bähr :
> in addition to gnome we could also try python.
> they accept python applications to run u
Hello,
2011/3/12 Martin Bähr :
> in addition to gnome we could also try python.
> they accept python applications to run under the umbrella of the python
> software foundation:
> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2011/03/now-accepting-applications-for-google.html
> http://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfC
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 01:33:36PM +0100, Martin Bähr wrote:
> we could just join gnome.
> the Gnome Dev Kit is a gnome project.
> work on anaconda and packagekit directly benefits the Dev kit.
>
> it would be enough if we can manage to get the dev kit and anaconda and
> packagekit as dev kit pr
The idea below is the best one i've read from the complete discussion
on this subject :)
I hope Og and Jesse will agree with that idea and make it accepted by
Gnome GSoC.
Until this idea is accepted, do you think there is interest to do a
first update to Gnome Dev Kit to make it uses unstable relea
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 08:49:26AM +0100, Mark Trompell wrote:
> Hi all,
> I created a page[1] in the wiki to collect some ideas for gsoc 2011,
> if we want to apply.
> Unfortunatly deadline is next friday, so we have only one week to get
> something written down.
> Feel free to add ideas, answer t
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Mark Trompell wrote:
> > one thing that is a concern for GSOC is our mentoring capability, and
> > our weight in the free software community.
> Looking at the past yeaers, I doubt that some organizations in gsoc
> had (and still have) any weight either.
tr
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Jesse Zhang wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 05:15 PM, Mark Trompell wrote:
>> What about reviving gnone dev kit?
>
> Yeah, that can count as one. But it probably doesn't need three months'
> work. And not as much programming involved.
That is probably true.
> jesse
--
M
On 03/03/2011 05:15 PM, Mark Trompell wrote:
> What about reviving gnone dev kit?
Yeah, that can count as one. But it probably doesn't need three months'
work. And not as much programming involved.
jesse
___
Foresight-devel mailing list
Foresight-devel@
> one thing that is a concern for GSOC is our mentoring capability, and
> our weight in the free software community.
Looking at the past yeaers, I doubt that some organizations in gsoc
had (and still have) any weight either.
--
Mark Trompell
Foresight Linux Xfce Edition
Cause your desktop shoul
What about reviving gnone dev kit?
--
Mark Trompell
Foresight Linux Xfce Edition
Cause your desktop should be freaking cool
(and Xfce)
___
Foresight-devel mailing list
Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org
http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-de
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Jesse Zhang wrote:
> btw, is our anaconda tree available somewhere?
All anaconda we have is on hg.rpath.com atm.
+ what is in fl:2{,-{devel,qa}}.
mull has done some basic work on f14 anaconda, but don't know where his code is.
> jesse
--
Mark Trompell
Foresight
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:51:44PM +0800, Jesse Zhang wrote:
> packagekit+conary is a good idea too. But given the oncoming change to
> conary (system model etc), it may not fit for a three-month work for a
> student, esp. if he's not already familiar with conary or packagekit.
well, most of the s
btw, is our anaconda tree available somewhere?
jesse
___
Foresight-devel mailing list
Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org
http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
On 03/03/2011 03:49 PM, Mark Trompell wrote:
> [1] https://wiki.foresightlinux.org/wiki/display/~mark__t/gsoc+2011
The ideas about anaconda are good. We only need to make sure there is a
mentor.
packagekit+conary is a good idea too. But given the oncoming change to
conary (system model etc), it m
17 matches
Mail list logo
