What About the categories ?¿ on r.Description() ???
Paul Scott-Wilson escribió:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:17:12AM -0500, Erik Southworth wrote:
>> I like the packageSummary and packageDescription. Does packageDescription
>> replace or override r.Description?
> It's using Description behind
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:17:12AM -0500, Erik Southworth wrote:
I like the packageSummary and packageDescription. Does packageDescription
replace or override r.Description?
It's using Description behind the scenes [1].
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:22:40PM +, Michael Tharp wrote:
I've been t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Scott-Wilson wrote:
| < doniphon> my idea (looking at a prototype atm) may be to do
| something more scalable
| < doniphon> we do a small (web)app a la fedora appDb that refs all
| our apps and their key metadata... and policy would read f
I like the packageSummary and packageDescription. Does packageDescription
replace or override r.Description?
I also noticed PackageKit has a project Homepage link too. I was usually
placing the project URL in the description but a packageHomepage would be
more appropriate.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:07:54PM -0500, Erik Southworth wrote:
build says: 'SetPackageMetadataFromRecipe: Package descriptions are not
set; Application metadata is critical for a good user experience. Please
consider fixing it'
This is from a Foresight policy which got added but I suspect isn
cvc explain PackageRecipe.Description
Erik Southworth escribió:
> build says: 'SetPackageMetadataFromRecipe: Package descriptions are not
> set; Application metadata is critical for a good user experience. Please
> consider fixing it'
>
> Is there other API's than
> "r.Licenses('GPL')
>
