xcess errors)
On my system,
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes56305
# of expected failures 232
# of unsupported tests 109
/home/kargl/gcc/obj/gcc/gfortran version 11.0.1 20210313 (experimental) (GCC)
AFAIK, my tree is up-to-date, but then again
Well, I am seeing the falling upon a closer look. I do not know if
related to the patch yet. Lets make sure this is fixed.
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr96013.f90 -O (test for ex
I have reviewed this and all looks good.
I also regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
I don't want to do a bunch of individual commits.
Steve, if you can do a ChangeLog I can commit in one blast.
Regards,
Jerry
On 3/13/21 1:33 PM, Steve Kargl via Fortran wrote:
The following patch fixes
The following patch fixes 91960, 93635, 95501, 95502, 95710, 96013,
96025, 97122, 99256, 99349, 99351, and 99506. Most of the individual
patches are languishing in bugzilla. One or two needed to reformatted
due to divergences in main and my local repository. Please commit.
diff --git a/gcc/fort
Hi Harald,
I am not sure of the etiquette for this - it looks OK to me :-)
Cheers
Paul
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 21:20, Harald Anlauf via Fortran
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> the addition of runtime checks for the SIZE intrinsic created a regression
> that showed up for certain CLASS arguments to pro
