Hi Tobias,
> I do not see any reason why 'tmp' is replaced by 'temp' in this
> code. Also for doing patch archeology, it helps if there are no
> changes unless it makes sense. Adding an -e- does not count ;-)
>
> Hence, OK with that change.
I've corrected that. This also reduces the size of
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 12:38:59PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 14.03.21 06:13, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
>
> > Well, I am seeing the falling upon a closer look. I do not know if
> > related to the patch yet. Lets make sure this is fixed.
> >
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90 -O (internal
I can convert the tabs/spaces no problem.
On 3/14/21 5:01 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Small additional remark: I see new lines which use 8 spaces instead of
a tab – that should also be fixed.
And: Please don't forget to CC gcc-patches@ as well.
Thanks,
Tobias
On 14.03.21 12:38, Tobias Burnus
Small additional remark: I see new lines which use 8 spaces instead of a
tab – that should also be fixed.
And: Please don't forget to CC gcc-patches@ as well.
Thanks,
Tobias
On 14.03.21 12:38, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 14.03.21 06:13, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Well, I am seeing the falling upon a
On 14.03.21 06:13, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Well, I am seeing the falling upon a closer look. I do not know if
related to the patch yet. Lets make sure this is fixed.
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr87907.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL:
Early ping – and minor post script:
+ hidden_typelist = TREE_CHAIN (hidden_typelist);
This change is to avoid running into the ICE:
gcc_assert (hidden_typelist == NULL_TREE
|| TREE_VALUE (hidden_typelist) == void_type_node);
The purpose of this assert is to check that
Hi Harald, hi Paul,
On 13.03.21 09:58, Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran wrote:
I am not sure of the etiquette for this - it looks OK to me :-)
:-)
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 21:20, Harald Anlauf via Fortran
the addition of runtime checks for the SIZE intrinsic created a regression
that
