I've backported several patches having to do with Fortran/C
interoperability from mainline to the OG11 branch. See attached log for
details.
-Sandra
commit d554155c07771935778f557e9ef649cc3624d1ce
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date: Wed Aug 11 19:24:17 2021 -0700
Fortran: Fix c_float128
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:12 PM Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi Tobias,
>
> > I am inclined to say that the Intel compiler has a bug by not
> > accepting it – but as written before, I regard sub-string length
> > (esp. with const expr) inquiries as an odd corner case which
> > is
Hi,
A while ago had a report of build failure against a Darwin branch on
the latest OS release. This was because (temporarily) the symlink
from libm.dylib => libSystem.dylib had been removed/omitted.
libm is not needed on Darwin, and should not be added unconditionally
even if that is (mostly)
Hi Tobias,
> I am inclined to say that the Intel compiler has a bug by not
> accepting it – but as written before, I regard sub-string length
> (esp. with const expr) inquiries as an odd corner case which
> is unlikely to occur in real-world code.
ok.
> Still does not work – or rather:
On 7/27/21 5:07 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Sandra, hi Thomas, hi all,
@Thomas K: Comments about the following - and of course to the
testsuite itself - are highly welcome.
In my opinion, the testsuite LGTM and can be committed.
@Sandra:
- Thoughts on the directory name? (cf. below)
- Give
Arjen,
If this is your first go around with patching gfortran,
I'll suggest running the testsuite (if you haven't, see
step 5. below; if you have see step 6.). I suspect you
already know much of what I enumerate below, but it may
help others.
With a bug report, the workflow for me is/was
1.
I have applied the patches locally (take care to restore the tabs ;)).
Should I now commit these changes or is there a more formal procedure
involved?
Regards,
Arjen
Op do 19 aug. 2021 om 08:59 schreef Arjen Markus :
> Hi Steve,
>
> I am willing to take up this challenge ;), as well as the
Hi Harald,
On 18.08.21 23:01, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Von: "Tobias Burnus"
Note, however, that gfc_simplify_len still won't handle neither
deferred strings nor their substrings.
Obviously, nonsubstrings cannot be simplified but I do not
see why len(str(1:2)) cannot or should not be simplified.
Hi Steve,
I am willing to take up this challenge ;), as well as the patch for C949.
It would be my next attempt to get acquainted with the source code (a first
step hopefully to actively contribute).
Regards,
Arjen
Op di 17 aug. 2021 om 21:02 schreef Steve Kargl via Fortran <
