Hi Tobias,
Am 21.03.23 um 09:31 schrieb Tobias Burnus:
On 20.03.23 21:57, Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches wrote:
--- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
@@ -9998,6 +9998,7 @@ gfc_match_modproc (void)
if ((gfc_state_stack->state != COMP_INTERFACE
&& gfc_state_stack->state
Hi,
LGTM, except for:
On 21.03.23 07:29, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
@@ -4708,7 +4710,12 @@ do_simplify (gfc_intrinsic_sym *specific, gfc_expr *e)
finish:
if (result == _bad_expr)
-return false;
+{
+ if (errorcount == old_errorcount
+ && (!gfc_buffered_p () &&
On 20.03.23 21:57, Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches wrote:
--- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
@@ -9998,6 +9998,7 @@ gfc_match_modproc (void)
if ((gfc_state_stack->state != COMP_INTERFACE
&& gfc_state_stack->state != COMP_CONTAINS)
|| gfc_state_stack->previous
Hi Harald,
This is good for trunk and for backporting.
Thanks for the rapid fix.
Paul
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 20:57, Harald Anlauf via Fortran
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> the attached trivial patch catches a MODULE PROCEDURE outside of a
> module interface before we run into an internal error.
>
Hi,
I refined the patch according to reviewer's advice. The main change is to
check if buffer_p is set and buffered error exists. Also two regtests are
fixed by catching the new error.
I sent out the revised one for review due to my limited knowledge on
Fortran front end.
The patch
