Dear all,
the attached patch fixes the passing of deferred-length character
to optional dummy arguments: the character length shall be passed
by reference, not by value.
Original analysis of the issue by Steve in PR93762, independently
done by FX in PR100651. The patch fixes both PRs.
This is the second version of the patch - previous discussion at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/636671.html
This patch adds the testcase from PR110415 and fixes the bug.
The problem is that in a couple of places in trans_class_assignment in
trans-expr.cc, we need to
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 11:33, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 27.11.23 11:20, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> > I think the lack of final '.' in:
>
> Indeed - but you are lagging a bit behind:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/638128.html
>
> [committed] c-family/c.opt
Hi,
On 27.11.23 11:20, Christophe Lyon wrote:
I think the lack of final '.' in:
Indeed - but you are lagging a bit behind:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/638128.html
[committed] c-family/c.opt (-Wopenmp): Add missing tailing '.'
Fri Nov 24 18:56:21 GMT 2023
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:20:20AM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 15:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > Comments or remarks before I commit it?
> >
> > LGTM, thanks for working on it.
> >
> > Jakub
> >
>
> I think the lack of final '.' in:
> gcc/c-family/c.opt
> +
Hi!
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 15:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 02:51:28PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > Following the general trend to add a "[-W...]" to the warning messages
> > for both better grouping of the warnings and - more importantly - for
> > providing
> > a
