Re: Can't link assembly routines

2024-03-14 Thread rep . dot . nop
On 13 March 2024 19:43:27 CET, Steve Kargl wrote: >On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:05:16PM +, Ken Woolridge wrote: >> >> When I attempt to link my test program (FF.F90) which calls UPPER_CASE (an >> assembly routine) I get the following error: >> >> C:/Program >>

Re: OpenACC 2.7: front-end support for readonly modifier: Add basic OpenACC 'declare' testing

2024-03-14 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi all, hi Thomas & Chung-Lin, Thomas Schwinge wrote: But I realized another thing: don't we have to handle the 'readonly' modifier also in Fortran module files, that is, next to the OpenACC 'declare' 'copyin' handling in 'gcc/fortran/module.cc': 'AB_OACC_DECLARE_COPYIN' etc.? I bet so; it is

Re: OpenACC 2.7: front-end support for readonly modifier: Add basic OpenACC 'declare' testing

2024-03-14 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi all, hi Thomas & Chung-Lin, Thomas Schwinge wrote: But I realized another thing: don't we have to handle the 'readonly' modifier also in Fortran module files, that is, next to the OpenACC 'declare' 'copyin' handling in 'gcc/fortran/module.cc': 'AB_OACC_DECLARE_COPYIN' etc.? I bet so; it is

OpenACC 2.7: front-end support for readonly modifier: Add basic OpenACC 'declare' testing (was: [PATCH, OpenACC 2.7, v2] readonly modifier support in front-ends)

2024-03-14 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2024-03-13T10:12:17+0100, I wrote: > On 2024-03-07T17:02:02+0900, Chung-Lin Tang > wrote: >> Also added simple 'declare' tests, but there is not anything to scan in the >> 'tree-original' dump though. > > Yeah, the current OpenACC 'declare' implementation is "special". Actually --