Re: nvptx, libgcc: Stub unwinding implementation

2024-06-06 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2023-01-20T22:04:02+0100, I wrote: > We've been (t)asked to enable (portions of) GCC/Fortran I/O for nvptx > offloading, which means building a normal (non-'LIBGFOR_MINIMAL') > configuration of libgfortran. One prerequisite patch, based on WIP work > by Andrew Stubbs, is: "nvptx, libgcc: S

Re: [committed] nvptx, libgfortran: Switch out of "minimal" mode

2024-06-06 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi Thomas, regarding the commit r15-1070-g3a4775d4403f2e / https://gcc.gnu.org/r15-1070 First, thanks for adding I/O support to nvptx offloading. I have a wording nit, to be confirmed by a native speaker: --- a/libgomp/libgomp.texi +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.texi ... +@item I/O within OpenMP tar

nvptx, libgfortran: Switch out of "minimal" mode

2024-06-06 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2023-01-20T22:16:00+0100, Hi wrote: > On 2023-01-20T22:04:02+0100, I wrote: >> We've been (t)asked to enable (portions of) GCC/Fortran I/O for nvptx >> offloading, which means building a normal (non-'LIBGFOR_MINIMAL') >> configuration of libgfortran. > > This is achieved by 'nvptx, libgfort

Re: [committed] nvptx, libgfortran: Switch out of "minimal" mode

2024-06-06 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 6/6/24 06:06, Tobias Burnus wrote: Hi Thomas, regarding the commit r15-1070-g3a4775d4403f2e / https://gcc.gnu.org/r15-1070 First, thanks for adding I/O support to nvptx offloading. I have a wording nit, to be confirmed by a native speaker: --- a/libgomp/libgomp.texi +++ b/libgomp/libgom

Re: [committed] nvptx, libgfortran: Switch out of "minimal" mode

2024-06-06 Thread Tobias Burnus
Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 6/6/24 06:06, Tobias Burnus wrote: +@item I/O within OpenMP target regions and OpenACC compute regions is supported +  using the C library @code{printf} functions. +  Additionally, the Fortran @code{print}/@code{write} statements are +  supported within O

Re: [GOMP, Fortran] RFC: Issues with gomp-fortran tests

2024-06-06 Thread Steve Kargl
Andre, I have not seen an answer to your email. I just built gcc/gfortran with a build directory named objx/. My 'make -j6 check-fortran' completed without issues (other than the usual broken libsaniziter tests and confusion of gmake versus make and $MAKE). From your description, it would certa

Re: [Patch, PR Fortran/90072] Polymorphic Dispatch to Polymophic Return Type Memory Leak

2024-06-06 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi Andre, I apologise for the slow response. It's been something of a heavy week... This is good for mainline. Thanks Paul PS That's good news about the funding. Maybe we will get to see "built in" coarrays soon? On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 11:25, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > Hi all, > > attached