Oops, looks like I mess up a testcase name. Fixed in this version.
On 8/6/2025 10:57 PM, Yuao Ma wrote:
Hi Tobias,
On 8/6/2025 4:32 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Yuao,
thanks for your patch. I have two nits:
* There is no diagnostic for -std=f2018 (or lower);
can you add the 'gfc_notify_std
Hi Tobias,
On 8/6/2025 4:32 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Yuao,
thanks for your patch. I have two nits:
* There is no diagnostic for -std=f2018 (or lower);
can you add the 'gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_F2023' ?
Done. Testcase added.
* I have a minor documentation nit; current wording is
at
On 8/6/2025 5:20 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Yuao,
thanks for the patch. — I have one nit:
Yuao Ma wrote:
This patch cleans up a duplicate test driver.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
...
Subject: [PATCH] fortran: cleanup duplicate tests for
c_f_pointer_shape_driver; nfc
'; nfc'?
tes
Hi Yuao,
thanks for the patch. — I have one nit:
Yuao Ma wrote:
This patch cleans up a duplicate test driver.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
...
Subject: [PATCH] fortran: cleanup duplicate tests for
c_f_pointer_shape_driver; nfc
'; nfc'?
tests_2_driver and tests_4_driver are identical,
Am 05.08.25 um 21:25 schrieb Jerry D:
> Hello,
>
> The attached patch fixes the subject bug by adding checks for ';' it specific
> places to avoid eating them and/or giving false errors.
>
Jerry, thanks a lot for tackling this!
But in an ideal world, standards would define a delimiter argument f
Hi Yuao,
thanks for your patch. I have two nits:
* There is no diagnostic for -std=f2018 (or lower);
can you add the 'gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_F2023' ?
* I have a minor documentation nit; current wording is
at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/C_005fF_005fPOINTER.html
Namely, ...
Yu
ping
At 2025-07-24 00:54:22, "ZAMBAR" wrote:
> This patch is an experimental implementation of multi-target clones
>clones for Fortran, allowing the use of the `TARGET_CLONES` attribute.
>It is designed to work with the syntax like:
>
>`!GCC$ ATTRIBUTES TARGET_CLONES("default", "avx", "avx512f")