Hi Sandra, hi all,
On 06.09.21 07:20, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 9/5/21 7:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 11:02 AM Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
On 9/5/21 7:31 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:31 PM Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
The testcase gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 that I
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:21 AM Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
> On 9/5/21 7:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 11:02 AM Sandra Loosemore
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/5/21 7:31 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:31 PM Sandra Loosemore <
> san...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
On 9/5/21 7:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 11:02 AM Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
On 9/5/21 7:31 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:31 PM Sandra Loosemore wrote:
The testcase gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 that I recently checked in
(originally written by José Rui Faustino de
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 11:02 AM Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
>
> On 9/5/21 7:31 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:31 PM Sandra Loosemore
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The testcase gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 that I recently checked in
> >> (originally written by José Rui Faustino de Sousa) depends
On 9/5/21 7:31 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:31 PM Sandra Loosemore wrote:
The testcase gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 that I recently checked in
(originally written by José Rui Faustino de Sousa) depends on the
header file to obtain a typedef for __complex128. It
appears not to be
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:31 PM Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>
> The testcase gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 that I recently checked in
> (originally written by José Rui Faustino de Sousa) depends on the
> header file to obtain a typedef for __complex128. It
> appears not to be possible to define an
The testcase gfortran.dg/PR100914.f90 that I recently checked in
(originally written by José Rui Faustino de Sousa) depends on the
header file to obtain a typedef for __complex128. It
appears not to be possible to define an equivalent type in a portable
way in the testcase itself (see
