Hi Tobias,
> OK. I wonder whether a valid len/kind example should be added which uses
> such a PDT with non-default-kind integer.
the testcase pdt_4.f03 did actually check for the error message that gets
removed and had to be adjusted. Removing just the dg-error does that job :-)
Thanks,
Harald
Dear Harald, dear all,
On 24.10.21 21:00, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
I've created PR 102917 for tracking this issue and packaged
the attached patch.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK mainline?
OK. I wonder whether a valid len/kind example should be added which uses
such a PDT with n
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 09:00:52PM +0200, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Dear Fortranners, Steve,
>
> I've created PR 102917 for tracking this issue and packaged
> the attached patch.
>
> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK mainline?
>
Thanks for picking this up. The patch looks good to me,
but you
Dear Fortranners, Steve,
I've created PR 102917 for tracking this issue and packaged
the attached patch.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK mainline?
Thanks,
Harald
> Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Oktober 2021 um 22:25 Uhr
> Von: "Steve Kargl"
> An: "Harald Anlauf"
> Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
> Bet